myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Werner Punz <werner.p...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [RE-VOTE] Release MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0 TCK
Date Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:24:41 GMT
+1
Am 13.01.11 19:21, schrieb Michael Freedman:
> Appropriate NOTICE/LICENSE files have now been added to the TCK project
> and a distributable has been built and is hosted on:
> http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Emfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/>.
>
> The zip has been verified to ensure its download allows one to build/run
> the TCK via maven. I also verified that the NOTICE/LICENSE exists and
> are included in the various .wars that get built as part of
> building/running the TCK.
>
> Please revote on this new distributable:
> ------------------------------------------------
> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
> and why.............
>
> On 1/12/2011 2:00 PM, Leonardo Uribe wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Checking the distributables, I have seen that there is no LICENSE /
>> NOTICE on the parent folder or in META-INF folder. Is that correct?
>>
>> In comparison, the files for portlet bridge 2.0
>> (portlet-bridge-2.0.0-src-all.zip) does have it.
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> Leonardo Uribe
>>
>> 2011/1/12 Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org
>> <mailto:matzew@apache.org>>
>>
>>     was there any reason why you didn't use Nexus for the release
>>     procedure?
>>     MyFaces (sub)projects agreed to use this..
>>
>>     On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Michael Freedman
>>     <michael.freedman@oracle.com <mailto:michael.freedman@oracle.com>>
>>     wrote:
>>     > Please vote on the proposed release of MyFaces Portlet Bridge
>>     2.0.0 TCK.
>>     > This is the final version of the JSR 329 TCK and corresponds to
>>     Portlet
>>     > 2.0 Bridge for JavaServer Faces 1.2 specification which was
>>     > finalized/approved by the JCP last month.
>>     >
>>     > Note: The TCK is designed to be built and run directly from the
>>     maven
>>     > project. Because of this users are pointed directly to the
>>     subversion tag
>>     > associated with version of the TCK:
>>     >
>>     https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/portlet-bridge/tck/tags/jsr329-1.0.0
>>     >
>>     > Hence there are no repository artifacts built or hosted.
>>     However, for
>>     > convenience we do provide a downloadable version of this project
>>     >
>>     > These components can be inspected in
>>     >
>>     http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/
>>     <http://people.apache.org/%7Emfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/>
>>     >
>>     > I have verified that the distributables can be expanded and the
>>     TCK can be
>>     > built/run from this. In addition I have verified the contents in the
>>     > subversion tag.
>>     >
>>     > Please review these materials and vote.
>>     >
>>     > ------------------------------------------------
>>     > [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
>>     > [ ] +0
>>     > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
>>     released,
>>     > and why..............
>>     >
>>     > Thanks,
>>     > -Mike-
>>     >
>>
>>
>>
>>     --
>>     Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>>     blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>     sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>     twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>>



Mime
View raw message