Mailing-List: contact dev-help@myfaces.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "MyFaces Development" <dev@myfaces.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of andrew.rw.robinson@gmail.com
 designates 74.125.83.181 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=RuU67HdwK7O+zZvyrUK06Fqe+6GXnTAfRbIVRmc4VYEoFGUAEN0SgPTDfX4WMnrY32
         JAaKtdsu/1O+ikHG9dqejdCXRblVvmc3gzHzZda+8TvlqZkz9A74LewjstBCYx5TK8Pc
         JTE0NycawmFnt+NJfxokV/pMlBjxx2dRl35Ew=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=pT-56ShEjSnNoZyg_0E7aU53H-DHAvgjswdVq@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTi=pT-56ShEjSnNoZyg_0E7aU53H-DHAvgjswdVq@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 12:00:52 -0600
Message-ID: <AANLkTikiXT4P_W2Lzs1huaPDNHvVgE1LqSY_W_aQ15BM@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Trinidad core: 2.0.0 beta1
From: Andrew Robinson <andrew.rw.robinson@gmail.com>
To: MyFaces Development <dev@myfaces.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

-0.5

It appears that the fix for TRINIDAD-1902 has some drawbacks that
cause some severe errors. The PseudoFacesContext.getViewRoot() throws
an unsupported operation exception when called. It should probably
just return null instead as that is what is expected when the view has
not be created/restored yet.

I would say that this should be fixed before a release.

-Andrew


On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wro=
te:
> Hi,
>
> I was running the needed tasks to get the first beta release of the Apach=
e
> MyFaces Trinidad 2.x CORE out. The artifacts are deployed to my private
> Apache account ([1]).
>
> Please take a look at the "2.0.0-beta1" artifacts and vote.
> Main diff between the other alphas is that ajax support has been added.
>
> ------------------------------------------------
> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
> =A0and why..............
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Thanks,
> Matthias
>
> [1] http://people.apache.org/~matzew/staging_repo/
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>