myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] getting rid of all java.net maven repositories
Date Thu, 19 Aug 2010 17:18:25 GMT
s/tomcat/tomahawk/ ;)



----- Original Message ----
> From: Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>
> To: MyFaces Development <dev@myfaces.apache.org>
> Sent: Thu, August 19, 2010 7:15:44 PM
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] getting rid of all java.net maven repositories
> 
> I also found out that we use 4 different versions of shale-test in  tomahawk.
> And shale-test-1.0.3 is pulling in the dev.java.net repository.
> 
> I now removed all  <repositories> from tomcat and until yet it at least builds


> fine.
> 
> We btw also have a repository.jboss.org repo in  myfaces-core. But this is way 

> better maintained than the dev.java.net 
> 
> one.
> 
> Another point would be to better utilise  <dependencyManagement> and 
> <pluginManagement>. Is it really  necessary to use 3 different 
> maven-builder-plugin versions in  tomahawk?
> 
> LieGrue,
> strub
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message  ----
> > From: Michael Kurz <michi.kurz@gmx.at>
> > To: dev@myfaces.apache.org
> > Sent:  Thu, August 19, 2010 6:00:00 PM
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] getting rid of  all java.net maven  repositories
> > 
> > Am 19.08.2010 16:58, schrieb Mark  Struberg:
> > > I just figured that we still  pretty often use the  java.net maven 
> >repositories.
> > > They are not well maintained  and often lead to weird  problems. Today I 
>tried 
>
> >to
> > >  compile tomahawk and got a weird exception  that shale-master-1.pom is 
> >broken.
> > 
> > Had the same problem some time ago. I   think what happened was that the 
> >specified repository location issued a  redirect  which was, for whatever 
>reason, 
>
> >stored in my local pom  file! I think what I did  then was to manually 
>download 
>
> >the  pom.
> > 
> > > Also, if we use Java JSR spec  APIs we should  always rely on geronimo spec

>
> >jars
> > > [1] instead of  pulling  them from the java.net repo! Geronimo spec jars 
>are
> > >  always IP cleared  which is _not_ guaranteed in the java.net repo.
> > 
> > +1
> > 
> > > We should  upgrade tomahawk to  myfaces-parent-9 and try to get rid of 
> >arbitrary
> > >   <repositories>.
> > 
> > +1
> > 
> > Michi
> > 
> 
> 
>       
> 


      

Mime
View raw message