Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 50060 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2010 16:03:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Jun 2010 16:03:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 34015 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2010 16:03:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-dev-archive@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 33962 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2010 16:03:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@myfaces.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "MyFaces Development" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 33955 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jun 2010 16:03:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Jun 2010 16:03:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lu4242@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.53 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.53] (HELO mail-pw0-f53.google.com) (209.85.160.53) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Jun 2010 16:03:24 +0000 Received: by pwj8 with SMTP id 8so1129758pwj.12 for ; Sat, 05 Jun 2010 09:03:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ycFPZ7JVaL7CoDijmKT6drsOm0mAcm0p4yVkGghlMoA=; b=rQksPAyKuGQMQz8DE6X70wJ3unygktBYsGFZaq6hgn/vLBQE0UUb4MmILSM84mNab4 /zTqP1AI7tstHoTAOGVSgJXS5xAXZ3Zuv7lXFPActgzPkVCzaygqgDMoMLT65xwFUwXM 1nP7pKXUWTbLI59me78YnqujkhhA3iySPESuE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=YiPeTevZ4AkybhunxJ/QxBhAD2Ffieo46l70m6tk8K9P5Q8ssQMVpHnr96HNeyCCeZ 5U0RSwhBSsrAlt7/rDy+TvFTAu1SvAYoWaAubQvOfi8/3qZUS5IHmqquS1kwV8pA2CJk RxA8bEVWgZrOuqmIhIjqFH/GDOGObwJHbH6bM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.86.3 with SMTP id o3mr9036010wfl.182.1275753782728; Sat, 05 Jun 2010 09:03:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.114.3 with HTTP; Sat, 5 Jun 2010 09:03:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 11:03:02 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [GSOC] Testing framework for the new testing API From: Leonardo Uribe To: MyFaces Development Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd5cda00a57de04884a93ec X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd5cda00a57de04884a93ec Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi What license is Arquillian? It is some kind of GPL or LGPL you should read this link: http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html Looking some source files of that project it seems it is Apache License v 2.0, so it is ok. I'll take a look at your proposal. regards, Leonardo Uribe 2010/6/5 Martinconi Cosmin > Hi, > > I've started working on my GSoC project "Automated webapp tests for MyFaces > core and extensions", > and the first target of the project is to create an testing API that will > be used for the project's testing of > MyFaces core, and if required for any extensions. > > For this after some studying and discussions I proposed Arquillian as a > framework in order to be integrated > into the API. Other frameworks that I considered are HTTPUnit and Canoo > WebTest. > > What do you think about Arquillian, any other ideas, should we reconsider > another framework? The scope > of the API is to be used for MyFaces core, bot also for any extension and > application testing that is needed. > > For more reference regarding my GSoC proposal and Arquillian documentation > you can check out: > > - http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/GSoC2010_AutomatedTests > - http://docs.jboss.org/arquillian/reference/latest/en-US/html_single/ > > > Regards, > Cosmin > --000e0cd5cda00a57de04884a93ec Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi

What license is Arquillian?

It is some kind of GPL or LGP= L you should read this link:

http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html

Looking= some source files of that project it seems it is Apache License v 2.0, so = it is ok.

I'll take a look at your proposal.

regards,

Leonardo = Uribe

2010/6/5 Martinconi Cosmin <cosmin.marti= nconi@codebeat.ro>
Hi,

I'= ve started working on my GSoC project "Automated webapp tests for MyFa= ces core and extensions",
and the first target of the project is to create an testing API that will b= e used for the project's testing of
MyFaces core, and if required for any extensions.

For this after som= e studying and discussions I proposed Arquillian as a framework in order to= be integrated
into the API. Other frameworks that I considered are HTT= PUnit and Canoo WebTest.

What do you think about Arquillian, any other ideas, should we reconsid= er another framework? The scope
of the API is to be used for MyFaces co= re, bot also for any extension and application testing that is needed.

For more reference regarding my GSoC proposal and Arquillian documentat= ion you can check out:

Regards,
= Cosmin

--000e0cd5cda00a57de04884a93ec--