myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mike Kienenberger <mkien...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1
Date Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:11:38 GMT
At this point, should this discussion be moved out of the voting thread?

By the way, MyFaces can include CDDL xsd and dtd spec files, so long
as they are appropriately documented.

http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b


On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Leonardo Uribe <lu4242@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Those files were copied from tomcat project:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk/java/javax/servlet/resources/
>
> There is no mention in NOTICE file there.
>
> regards,
>
> Leonardo Uribe
>
> 2010/6/15 Bernd Bohmann <bernd.bohmann@atanion.com>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> the geronimo project includes these file as well. See:
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk/NOTICE
>>
>> Maybe we should follow with the same procedure.
>>
>> Any suggestions?
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Bernd
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Werner Punz <werner.punz@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi, sorry to be nitpicking again, but since both files are CDDL are we
>> > even
>> > allowed to bundle them?
>> > Or are both clear due to reimplementation and this was an error made on
>> > Bernds side.
>> >
>> >
>> > Werner
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Am 14.06.10 19:57, schrieb Leonardo Uribe:
>> >>
>> >> Hi Bernd
>> >>
>> >> All artifacts has been regenerated, to include your fix, so we can
>> >> continue with the vote.
>> >>
>> >> regards,
>> >>
>> >> Leonardo Uribe
>> >>
>> >> 2010/6/13 Bernd Bohmann <bernd.bohmann@googlemail.com
>> >> <mailto:bernd.bohmann@googlemail.com>>
>> >>
>> >>    Hello,
>> >>
>> >>    here is my
>> >>
>> >>    -1
>> >>
>> >>    I found too many files without or old apache license header.
>> >>    j4fry is missing in the notice file.
>> >>
>> >>    The files
>> >>
>> >>  core/impl/src/main/resources/org/apache/myfaces/resource/javaee_5.xsd
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>  core/impl/src/main/resources/org/apache/myfaces/resource/javaee_web_services_client_1_2.xsd
>> >>    are cddl and are missing in the notice file
>> >>
>> >>    I have tried to fix some of the errors in the trunk and in the 2.0.1
>> >>    branch.
>> >>
>> >>    Regards
>> >>
>> >>    Bernd
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>    On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de
>> >>    <mailto:struberg@yahoo.de>> wrote:
>> >>     > +0 the artifacts look good so far, but I was not able to build
>> >>    them from the source distribution.
>> >>     >
>> >>     > LieGrue,
>> >>     > strub
>> >>     >
>> >>     >
>> >>     > --- On Fri, 6/11/10, Leonardo Uribe <lu4242@gmail.com
>> >>    <mailto:lu4242@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >>     >
>> >>     > From: Leonardo Uribe <lu4242@gmail.com <mailto:lu4242@gmail.com>>
>> >>     > Subject: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1
>> >>     > To: "MyFaces Development" <dev@myfaces.apache.org
>> >>    <mailto:dev@myfaces.apache.org>>
>> >>     > Date: Friday, June 11, 2010, 7:06 PM
>> >>     >
>> >>     > Hi,
>> >>     >
>> >>     > I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.0.1 release of Apache
>> >>     > MyFaces core out.
>> >>     >
>> >>     > The artifacts passed all TCK tests.
>> >>     >
>> >>     > Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
>> >>     >  1. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.shared" v4.0.2
 [1]
>> >>     >
>> >>     >  2. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.core" v2.0.1  [1]
>> >>     >  3. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.test" v1.0.0-beta-4
>> >> [1]
>> >>     >
>> >>     > The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1]
and
>> >>    [3] for binary and source packages).
>> >>     >
>> >>     >
>> >>     > The release notes could be found at [4].
>> >>     >
>> >>     > Also the clirr test does not show binary incompatibilities with
>> >>    myfaces-api.
>> >>     >
>> >>     > Please take a look at the "2.0.1" artifacts and vote!
>> >>     >
>> >>     > Please note: This vote is "majority approval" with a minimum
of
>> >> three
>> >>     >
>> >>     > +1 votes (see [3]).
>> >>     >
>> >>     > ------------------------------------------------
>> >>     > [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
>> >>     > [ ] +0
>> >>     > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
>> >>    released,
>> >>     >
>> >>     >  and why..............
>> >>     > ------------------------------------------------
>> >>     >
>> >>     > Thanks,
>> >>     > Leonardo Uribe
>> >>     >
>> >>     > [1] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201
>> >>    <http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201>
>> >>     >
>> >>     > [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
>> >>     > [3] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201binsrc
>> >>    <http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201binsrc>
>> >>     >
>> >>     > [4]
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600&styleName=Html&version=12315117
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>  <http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600&styleName=Html&version=12315117>
>> >>     >
>> >>     >
>> >>     >
>> >>     >
>> >>     >
>> >>     >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
>

Mime
View raw message