myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bernd Bohmann <bernd.bohm...@atanion.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1
Date Tue, 15 Jun 2010 20:26:54 GMT
Hello Leonardo,

looks ok for me.

Can you also add in api

META-INF/licenses/dojo-LICENSE.TXT
META-INF/licenses/j4fry-LICENSE.TXT
META-INF/licenses/glassfish-LICENSE.TXT
META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT

and in impl

META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT

an example would be

http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/tomahawk/trunk/core/src/main/resources/META-INF/licenses/

I have no time to perform the required changes unit tomorrow afternoon.

Regards

Bernd

On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Leonardo Uribe <lu4242@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I think the NOTICE.txt file on impl module could be like this:
>
> This product includes software developed by:
> The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> See the file LICENSE.txt
> See licenses for accompanying products in the "/licenses" subdirectory.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> This software also includes code from Facelets
> (https://facelets.dev.java.net/)
> for the purpose of implementing Facelets PDL for JSF 2.0 support.
>
> This product includes schema files developed for the Glassfish Java EE
> reference implementation (http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/).
> Apache Myfaces elects to include this software in this distribution
> under the CDDL license.  You can obtain a copy of the License at:
>     https://glassfish.dev.java.net/public/CDDL+GPL.html
> The source code is available at:
>     https://glassfish.dev.java.net/source/browse/glassfish/
>
> The following schemas are included:
>
> ===========================
>   javaee_5.xsd
>   javaee_web_services_client_1_2.xsd
> ===========================
>
> If no comments, I'll commit this fix tomorrow, regenerate all artifacts and
> start vote again.
>
> regards,
>
> Leonardo Uribe
>
> 2010/6/15 Leonardo Uribe <lu4242@gmail.com>
>>
>> Ok, let me know when all fixes has been applied, so I can regenerate
>> (again) the artifacts.
>>
>> To prevent misunderstandings, it is better to propose another vote and
>> after that wait another 72 hours for release.
>>
>> 2010/6/15 Mike Kienenberger <mkienenb@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> The licensing issue has to be fixed, if there is such an issue.
>>> And Bernd needs to withdraw his -1 before we can release using this vote.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Leonardo Uribe <lu4242@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > 2010/6/15 Mike Kienenberger <mkienenb@gmail.com>
>>> >>
>>> >> At this point, should this discussion be moved out of the voting
>>> >> thread?
>>> >>
>>> >> By the way, MyFaces can include CDDL xsd and dtd spec files, so long
>>> >> as they are appropriately documented.
>>> >>
>>> >> http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > So we can close this vote and continue the release procedure, right?
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Leonardo Uribe <lu4242@gmail.com>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >> > Hi
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Those files were copied from tomcat project:
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk/java/javax/servlet/resources/
>>> >> >
>>> >> > There is no mention in NOTICE file there.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > regards,
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Leonardo Uribe
>>> >> >
>>> >> > 2010/6/15 Bernd Bohmann <bernd.bohmann@atanion.com>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Hello,
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> the geronimo project includes these file as well. See:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk/NOTICE
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Maybe we should follow with the same procedure.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Any suggestions?
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Regards
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Bernd
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Werner Punz
>>> >> >> <werner.punz@gmail.com>
>>> >> >> wrote:
>>> >> >> > Hi, sorry to be nitpicking again, but since both files
are CDDL
>>> >> >> > are
>>> >> >> > we
>>> >> >> > even
>>> >> >> > allowed to bundle them?
>>> >> >> > Or are both clear due to reimplementation and this was
an error
>>> >> >> > made
>>> >> >> > on
>>> >> >> > Bernds side.
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > Werner
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > Am 14.06.10 19:57, schrieb Leonardo Uribe:
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> Hi Bernd
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> All artifacts has been regenerated, to include your
fix, so we
>>> >> >> >> can
>>> >> >> >> continue with the vote.
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> regards,
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> Leonardo Uribe
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> 2010/6/13 Bernd Bohmann <bernd.bohmann@googlemail.com
>>> >> >> >> <mailto:bernd.bohmann@googlemail.com>>
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>    Hello,
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>    here is my
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>    -1
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>    I found too many files without or old apache
license header.
>>> >> >> >>    j4fry is missing in the notice file.
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>    The files
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>  core/impl/src/main/resources/org/apache/myfaces/resource/javaee_5.xsd
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>  core/impl/src/main/resources/org/apache/myfaces/resource/javaee_web_services_client_1_2.xsd
>>> >> >> >>    are cddl and are missing in the notice file
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>    I have tried to fix some of the errors in the
trunk and in
>>> >> >> >> the
>>> >> >> >> 2.0.1
>>> >> >> >>    branch.
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>    Regards
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>    Bernd
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>    On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Mark Struberg
>>> >> >> >> <struberg@yahoo.de
>>> >> >> >>    <mailto:struberg@yahoo.de>> wrote:
>>> >> >> >>     > +0 the artifacts look good so far, but
I was not able to
>>> >> >> >> build
>>> >> >> >>    them from the source distribution.
>>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >> >>     > LieGrue,
>>> >> >> >>     > strub
>>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >> >>     > --- On Fri, 6/11/10, Leonardo Uribe <lu4242@gmail.com
>>> >> >> >>    <mailto:lu4242@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >> >>     > From: Leonardo Uribe <lu4242@gmail.com
>>> >> >> >> <mailto:lu4242@gmail.com>>
>>> >> >> >>     > Subject: [VOTE] release for myfaces core
2.0.1
>>> >> >> >>     > To: "MyFaces Development" <dev@myfaces.apache.org
>>> >> >> >>    <mailto:dev@myfaces.apache.org>>
>>> >> >> >>     > Date: Friday, June 11, 2010, 7:06 PM
>>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >> >>     > Hi,
>>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >> >>     > I was running the needed tasks to get the
2.0.1 release of
>>> >> >> >> Apache
>>> >> >> >>     > MyFaces core out.
>>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >> >>     > The artifacts passed all TCK tests.
>>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >> >>     > Please note that this vote concerns all
of the following
>>> >> >> >> parts:
>>> >> >> >>     >  1. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.shared"
>>> >> >> >> v4.0.2
>>> >> >> >>  [1]
>>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >> >>     >  2. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.core"
v2.0.1
>>> >> >> >>  [1]
>>> >> >> >>     >  3. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.test"
>>> >> >> >> v1.0.0-beta-4
>>> >> >> >> [1]
>>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >> >>     > The artifacts are deployed to my private
Apache account
>>> >> >> >> ([1]
>>> >> >> >> and
>>> >> >> >>    [3] for binary and source packages).
>>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >> >>     > The release notes could be found at [4].
>>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >> >>     > Also the clirr test does not show binary
incompatibilities
>>> >> >> >> with
>>> >> >> >>    myfaces-api.
>>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >> >>     > Please take a look at the "2.0.1" artifacts
and vote!
>>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >> >>     > Please note: This vote is "majority approval"
with a
>>> >> >> >> minimum
>>> >> >> >> of
>>> >> >> >> three
>>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >> >>     > +1 votes (see [3]).
>>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >> >>     > ------------------------------------------------
>>> >> >> >>     > [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed
the bits
>>> >> >> >>     > [ ] +0
>>> >> >> >>     > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause
these bits not to
>>> >> >> >> be
>>> >> >> >>    released,
>>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >> >>     >  and why..............
>>> >> >> >>     > ------------------------------------------------
>>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >> >>     > Thanks,
>>> >> >> >>     > Leonardo Uribe
>>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >> >>     > [1] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201
>>> >> >> >>    <http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201>
>>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >> >>     > [2]
>>> >> >> >> http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
>>> >> >> >>     > [3] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201binsrc
>>> >> >> >>    <http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201binsrc>
>>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >> >>     > [4]
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600&styleName=Html&version=12315117
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>  <http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600&styleName=Html&version=12315117>
>>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>
>
>

Mime
View raw message