Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 58048 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2010 18:42:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Apr 2010 18:42:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 44116 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 18:42:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-dev-archive@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 44049 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2010 18:42:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@myfaces.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "MyFaces Development" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 44042 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2010 18:42:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:42:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gerhard.petracek@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.222 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.222] (HELO mail-bw0-f222.google.com) (209.85.218.222) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:42:50 +0000 Received: by bwz22 with SMTP id 22so2789885bwz.25 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 11:42:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:received:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=2JJb0noZuoXIl7GpO+1e6PUwTKhMoI6UpkIpMgsOqJA=; b=m9P8VhFSQ+NyCNfkdWAHnpONrXgI3WFsf1YwQ8jRvAbOG7x4gOxMJ69oWHc+tUCKL0 pv3stzJ7ctXDNb7Ow4t0XLOfuLYWRYya9YG51VTqJ5wp77PEnThxQQ6jXSX/ZN7ukjXC K3m0GowRsM4GjVAYdWvHrnUtsja99s9BuWpfQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=s7fja7v0lQm4vM1dfH4uGozaNQICVWnlJPx+4hKWxzVoQ6icqdWTRE06mvOujlgaep maK0Ajj05vnYkBF9n0NhMebeJ3lRCpKFMrgkI1RWaz5qdZqQ+FllrvQFUEYnrt0IdBev KEVP1K0wvGn/d3H2By2ZEteT61CukT+xNA2EQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.146.3 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 11:42:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <660510.26353.qm@web27808.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> From: Gerhard Petracek Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 20:42:07 +0200 Received: by 10.239.182.193 with SMTP id r1mr146752hbg.210.1271443347335; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 11:42:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: Ext Scripting Quo Vadis To: MyFaces Development Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163649a36d11e9aa04845ef97c --00163649a36d11e9aa04845ef97c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1 regards, gerhard http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces 2010/4/16 Leonardo Uribe > Hi > > I think it is a good idea to make a release of ext-scripting. > > +1 > > regards, > > Leonardo Uribe > > 2010/4/16 Jakob Korherr > > +1 on the final release :) >> >> Regards, >> Jakob >> >> 2010/4/16 Matthias Wessendorf >> >>> I am fine with doing a _real_ release here >>> >>> >>> -M >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Werner Punz >>> wrote: >>> > Hello >>> > >>> > I just wanted to know a general opinion here, Ext-Scripting has been in >>> beta >>> > stage for a while (while we have tagged one none of us had time to make >>> a >>> > full blown release given all our other tasks at hand) >>> > >>> > But I personally think, since the thing at least for me already works >>> really >>> > well (used it again this week for prototyping some JSF2 components at a >>> > customer) and I did a lot of bugfixing, that I do not want to do >>> another >>> > beta release but want to go for a full blown final release with a >>> bugfix >>> > release shortly thereafter. >>> > >>> > The reason is: >>> > >>> > a) I personally think it is ready, I want to do some additional testing >>> and >>> > fixing as time permits next week, as time permits, but I think it is ok >>> to >>> > release it >>> > >>> > b) I want people start using it, which means they will touch it with a >>> final >>> > release >>> > >>> > c) It would be good to get the release out very close to myfaces sort >>> of as >>> > a pushing extra for MyFaces 2.0 (my original timeframe was one month >>> after >>> > the myfaces release, it could be shorter now) >>> > >>> > d) I want to start the work on 1.1 so that we get the infrastructure in >>> > place to get spring an and have Bernhard starting on his GSOC project >>> > which will bring CDI integration, but that means some refactorings >>> which I >>> > cannot do as long as I am in beta here (and I do not want to branch >>> again( >>> > >>> > I personally think that 1.0 is more or less a proof of concept and >>> > foundation, and a valuable asset for component writers (thats probably >>> where >>> > 1.0 will be used most), once we have Spring and CDI working people >>> really >>> > have something on their hands they can work with. >>> > >>> > So what is the general opinion on this? >>> > >>> > Werner >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Matthias Wessendorf >>> >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Jakob Korherr >> >> blog: http://www.jakobk.com >> twitter: http://twitter.com/jakobkorherr >> work: http://www.irian.at >> > > --00163649a36d11e9aa04845ef97c Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1

regards,
gerhard

http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhou= se -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces

2010/4/16 Leonardo Uribe &= lt;lu4242@gmail.com>
<= blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px= #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"> Hi

I think it is a good idea to make a release of ext-scripting.
=
+1

regards,

Leonardo Uribe

2010/4/16 Jakob Korherr <jakob.korherr@gmail.com><= div>

+1 on the final release= :)

Regards,
Jakob

2010/4/16 Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org>
<= blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-l= eft:1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);padding-left:1ex"> I am fine with doing a _real_ release here


-M

On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Werner Punz <werner.punz@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello
>
> I just wanted to know a general opinion here, Ext-Scripting has been i= n beta
> stage for a while (while we have tagged one none of us had time to mak= e a
> full blown release given all our other tasks at hand)
>
> But I personally think, since the thing at least for me already works = really
> well (used it again this week for prototyping some JSF2 components at = a
> customer) and I did a lot of bugfixing, that I do not want to do anoth= er
> beta release but want to go for a full blown final release with a bugf= ix
> release shortly thereafter.
>
> The reason is:
>
> a) I personally think it is ready, I want to do some additional testin= g and
> fixing as time permits next week, as time permits, but I think it is o= k to
> release it
>
> b) I want people start using it, which means they will touch it with a= final
> release
>
> c) It would be good to get the release out very close to myfaces sort = of as
> a pushing extra for MyFaces 2.0 (my original timeframe was one month a= fter
> the myfaces release, it could be shorter now)
>
> d) I want to start the work on 1.1 so that we get the infrastructure i= n
> place to get spring an and have Bernhard starting on his GSOC project<= br> > which will bring CDI integration, but that means some refactorings whi= ch I
> cannot do as long as I am in beta here (and I do not want to branch ag= ain(
>
> I personally think that 1.0 is more or less a proof of concept and
> foundation, and a valuable asset for component writers (thats probably= where
> 1.0 will be used most), once we have Spring and CDI working people rea= lly
> have something on their hands they can work with.
>
> So what is the general opinion on this?
>
> Werner
>
>
>



--




--00163649a36d11e9aa04845ef97c--