myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>
Subject Re: [Ext-CDI] @Transactional
Date Wed, 17 Feb 2010 08:42:35 GMT
Hi!

Btw, if someone of you already have a github account, then tell me your names and I'll grant
you rights until we have SVN and votes done.

LieGrue,
strub

--- Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petracek@gmail.com> schrieb am Mo, 15.2.2010:

> Von: Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petracek@gmail.com>
> Betreff: Re: [Ext-CDI] @Transactional
> An: "MyFaces Development" <dev@myfaces.apache.org>
> Datum: Montag, 15. Februar, 2010 16:25 Uhr
> hi arne,
> @source code:we should start a new
> thread for discussing that.i'll send some
> suggestions within the next days.
> regards,gerhard
> 
> 
> 
> http://www.irian.at
> 
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
> 
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> 
> 
> 
> 2010/2/15 Arne Limburg <arne.limburg@openknowledge.de>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hi
> Gerhard,
> 
>  
> 
> I took a look at the
> CDI-API and think it is not so hard to
> implement support for every custom scope. CDI is very
> framework-developer-friendly ;-)
> 
> I try to extend my
> code with this feature this evening I think.
> 
>  
> 
> BTW is there a
> better place to put my code at?
> 
>  
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Arne
> 
>  
> 
> --
> 
>  
> 
> Arne Limburg -
> Enterprise Developer
> 
> OpenKnowledge GmbH,
> Oldenburg
> 
> Bismarckstraße 13,
> 26122 Oldenburg
> 
> Mobil: +49 (0) 151 -
> 108 22 942
> 
> Tel: +49 (0) 441 -
> 4082-0
> 
> Fax: +49 (0) 441 -
> 4082-111
> 
> arne.limburg@openknowledge.de
> 
> http://www.openknowledge.de
> 
>  
> 
> Registergericht:
> Amtsgericht Oldenburg, HRB 4670
> 
> Geschäftsführer:
> Lars Röwekamp, Jens Schumann
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> Von: Gerhard Petracek
> [mailto:gerhard.petracek@gmail.com]
> 
> 
> Gesendet: Montag, 15. Februar 2010
> 14:38
> 
> An: MyFaces Development
> 
> Betreff: Re: [Ext-CDI]
> @Transactional
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> hi arne,
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> i'm talking about a conversation
> concept which allows
> different conversations at the same time (one conversation
> for 1-n beans).
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> furthermore, it should be possible to
> invalidate and/or
> restart them immediately (not at the end of a request) and
> it should be
> independent of plain cdi-conversations. so users can use
> both concepts in
> parallel. we could call it e.g. @NamedConversation.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> however, as i said - if it is possible
> @Transactional should
> be compatible with every custom cdi-scope.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> it isn't the easiest goal but i
> think it makes sense. so we
> should try it.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> regards,
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> gerhard
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> http://www.irian.at
> 
> 
> 
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> 
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> 
> Courses in English and German
> 
> 
> 
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 2010/2/15 Arne Limburg <arne.limburg@openknowledge.de>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hi
> Gerhard,
> 
>  
> 
> We should implement
> the new
> conversation scope to fall back to the CDI conversation
> scope, like currently
> the CDI conversation scope falls back to request scope.
> This would have many
> advantages imho. I think, if we achieve this, my
> EntityManager-injection implementation
> would work for it (just have to replace @ConversationScoped
> with the new
> scope).
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Arne
> 
>  
> 
> --
> 
>  
> 
> Arne Limburg -
> Enterprise
> Developer
> 
> OpenKnowledge GmbH,
> Oldenburg
> 
> Bismarckstraße 13,
> 26122 Oldenburg
> 
> Mobil: +49 (0) 151 -
> 108 22 942
> 
> Tel: +49 (0) 441 -
> 4082-0
> 
> Fax: +49 (0) 441 -
> 4082-111
> 
> arne.limburg@openknowledge.de
> 
> http://www.openknowledge.de
> 
>  
> 
> Registergericht:
> Amtsgericht Oldenburg,
> HRB 4670
> 
> Geschäftsführer:
> Lars Röwekamp, Jens
> Schumann
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Von: Gerhard
> Petracek [mailto:gerhard.petracek@gmail.com]
> 
> 
> Gesendet: Montag, 15. Februar 2010 13:44
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> An: MyFaces Development
> 
> Betreff: Re: [Ext-CDI] @Transactional
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> hi
> arne,
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> thx
> for providing the source code.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> i'll
> have a look at it after the jsfdays.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> one
> of the goals is to provide an alternative conversation
> scope for cdi which
> allows to use the conversation concepts provided by
> orchestra.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> so
> we have to ensure that it works with every custom cdi
> scope.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> (cdi
> conversations would be the default scope)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> regards,
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> gerhard
> 
> 
> 
> http://www.irian.at
> 
> 
> 
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> 
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> 
> Courses in English and German
> 
> 
> 
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> 
> 
> 
> 2010/2/15
> Arne Limburg <arne.limburg@openknowledge.de>
> 
> Hi,
> 
> 
> 
> I've prototyped some code that injects
> conversation-scoped EntityManagers
> reading the unitName from the qualifier annotation and
> added @Transactional
> support for this EntityManagers. This code needs some
> thinking though, e.g. how
> to handle the default-case (no unitName specified)...
> 
> 
> 
> If you want to take a look at it, I have created a Wiki
> page and added my code
> as attachment:
> 
> http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Extensions/CDI/DevDoc/Drafts/Transactional
> 
> 
> 
> This code could be a starting point to implement
> Orchestra-like conversations
> (starting with CDI-Conversations)...
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Arne
> 
> 
> 
> --
> 
> 
> 
> Arne Limburg - Enterprise Developer
> 
> OpenKnowledge GmbH, Oldenburg
> 
> Bismarckstraße 13, 26122 Oldenburg
> 
> Mobil: +49 (0) 151 - 108 22 942
> 
> Tel: +49 (0) 441 - 4082-0
> 
> Fax: +49 (0) 441 - 4082-111
> 
> arne.limburg@openknowledge.de
> 
> http://www.openknowledge.de
> 
> 
> 
> Registergericht: Amtsgericht Oldenburg, HRB 4670
> 
> Geschäftsführer: Lars Röwekamp, Jens Schumann
> 
> 
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> 
> Von: Mark Struberg [mailto:struberg@yahoo.de]
> 
> 
> 
> Gesendet:
> Samstag, 13. Februar 2010 20:27
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> An:
> MyFaces Development
> 
> Betreff: AW: [Ext-CDI] @Transactional
> 
> 
> 
> > I am afraid supporting multiple persistence-units in
> that
> 
> > scenario is very difficult...
> 
> 
> 
> Nope, it's really easy. I simply use Qualifiers to
> distinguish between them.
> 
> 
> 
> @Qualifier
> 
> public @instance Core {}
> 
> 
> 
> @Qualifier
> 
> public @instance Other {}
> 
> 
> 
> ----
> 
> @RequestScoped
> 
> public class EMProducer {
> 
> private @PersistenceContext(unitName="core")
> EntityManager emCore;
> 
> private @PersistenceContext(unitName="other")
> EntityManager emOther;
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> public @Produces @Core EntityManager getCoreEM() {return
> emCore;}
> 
> public @Produces @Other EntityManager getOtherEM() {return
> emOther;}
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Injection happens with
> 
> 
> 
> private @Inject @Core EntityManager
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Got the idea?
> 
> 
> 
> LieGrue,
> 
> strub
> 
> 
> 
> --- Arne Limburg <arne.limburg@openknowledge.de>
> schrieb am Sa, 13.2.2010:
> 
> 
> 
> > Von: Arne Limburg <arne.limburg@openknowledge.de>
> 
> > Betreff: AW: [Ext-CDI] @Transactional
> 
> > An: "MyFaces Development" <dev@myfaces.apache.org>
> 
> > Datum: Samstag, 13. Februar 2010, 20:06
> 
> > Hi Mark,
> 
> >
> 
> > thank you for your feedback. I was aware of the
> requirement
> 
> > of CDI-containers to inject JavaEE resources in a
> 
> > JavaEE-environment, but Gerhard and I are thinking
> about a
> 
> > generic non-JavaEE-solution for
> EntityManager-injection. And
> 
> > at least weld does no injection of JavaEE-resources in
> this
> 
> > case. How does OpenWebBeans?
> 
> > I am afraid supporting multiple persistence-units in
> that
> 
> > scenario is very difficult...
> 
> >
> 
> > Nonetheless it would be nice to see your
> 
> > multiple-database-handling TransactionInterceptor in
> CODI.
> 
> >
> 
> > Regards,
> 
> > Arne
> 
> >
> 
> > --
> 
> >
> 
> > Arne Limburg - Enterprise Developer
> 
> > OpenKnowledge GmbH, Oldenburg
> 
> > Bismarckstraße 13, 26122 Oldenburg
> 
> > Mobil: +49 (0) 151 - 108 22 942
> 
> > Tel: +49 (0) 441 - 4082-0
> 
> > Fax: +49 (0) 441 - 4082-111
> 
> > arne.limburg@openknowledge.de
> 
> > http://www.openknowledge.de
> 
> 
> 
> >
> 
> > Registergericht: Amtsgericht Oldenburg, HRB 4670
> 
> > Geschäftsführer: Lars Röwekamp, Jens Schumann
> 
> >
> 
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> 
> > Von: Mark Struberg [mailto:struberg@yahoo.de]
> 
> >
> 
> > Gesendet: Samstag, 13. Februar 2010 15:39
> 
> > An: MyFaces Development
> 
> > Betreff: AW: [Ext-CDI] @Transactional
> 
> >
> 
> > Hi!
> 
> >
> 
> > The JSR-299 spec defines that we have to support
> injection
> 
> > of EE-Resources.
> 
> >
> 
> > This was more explicit in the old version of the spec,
> but
> 
> > unless the wording got shortened, I still think
> injection of
> 
> > @PersistenceUnit and @PersistenceContext must be
> supported
> 
> > by any JSR-299 container (at least in an EE
> environment).
> 
> >
> 
> > For OpenWebBeans, you can simply use our
> 
> > openwebbeans-resource plugin. Please note that this
> is
> 
> > necessary because OWB is modular, and
> openwebbeans-impl (the
> 
> > core) will have no EE dependencies at all (not even
> JSF,
> 
> > JPA, etc!) This will get picked up automatically if it
> is
> 
> > available in the classpath, e.g. you can simply define
> the
> 
> > following maven dependency:
> 
> >
> 
> >         <dependency>
> 
> >                
> 
> >
> <groupId>org.apache.openwebbeans</groupId>
> 
> >                
> 
> >
> <artifactId>openwebbeans-resource</artifactId>
> 
> >                
> 
> > <version>${owb.version}</version>
> 
> >         </dependency>
> 
> >
> 
> > OWB supports 2 different scenarios. If you are not
> running
> 
> > in a JTA aware container like e.g. OpenEJB, you will
> 
> > automatically use a simple resource version of an SPI
> 
> > implementation which uses
> 
> > Persistence#createEntityManagerFactory(unitName) for
> 
> > injecting (Thus getting an extended EM). If you use
> e.g.
> 
> > OpenEJB, we are able to get the injectable resources
> 
> > directly from there (thus getting a transactional
> EM).
> 
> >
> 
> > Once this is available, you can simply create a
> producer
> 
> > method for the EntityManager:
> 
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/samples/reservation/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/reservation/util/EntityManagerUtil.java
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> >
> 
> > There is also an example on how to implement a
> 
> > TransactionalInterceptor:
> 
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/samples/reservation/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/reservation/intercept/TransactionalInterceptor.java
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> >
> 
> > In my company, I already implemented a
> 
> > TransactionalInteceptor which is capable of handling
> 
> > multiple databases at a time and also correctly
> handles
> 
> > nested transactions. I hope to migrate this over to
> CODI in
> 
> > the near future.
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> > LieGrue,
> 
> > strub
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> > --- Arne Limburg <arne.limburg@openknowledge.de>
> 
> > schrieb am Sa, 13.2.2010:
> 
> >
> 
> > > Von: Arne Limburg <arne.limburg@openknowledge.de>
> 
> > > Betreff: AW: [Ext-CDI] @Transactional
> 
> > > An: "'MyFaces Development'"
> <dev@myfaces.apache.org>
> 
> > > Datum: Samstag, 13. Februar 2010, 14:42
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > > 
> 
> > > 
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > > 
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > > Hi Gerhard,
> 
> > >
> 
> > >   
> 
> > >
> 
> > > OK, I got what you did,
> 
> > > basically I did the same. You are right,
> 
> > > that was pretty straight-forward, but I had to
> 
> > hard-code
> 
> > > the persistence-unit
> 
> > > name.
> 
> > >
> 
> > >   
> 
> > >
> 
> > > I have two ideas to inject the
> 
> > > persistence-unit name into the
> 
> > > producer-method for the EntityManager:
> 
> > >
> 
> > >   
> 
> > >
> 
> > > First idea: A
> 
> > > @PersistenceUnitName qualifier-annotation to
> 
> > > inject the name into the producer-method. Client
> code
> 
> > would
> 
> > > have somethink like
> 
> > >
> 
> > > public class Configuration
> 
> > > {
> 
> > >
> 
> > >   
> 
> > >
> 
> > >   @Produces
> 
> > > @PersistenceUnitName
> 
> > >
> 
> > >   String
> 
> > > getPersistenceUnitName() {
> 
> > >
> 
> > > …
> 
> > >
> 
> > > Not really nice, but the
> 
> > > simplest solution to generify it.
> 
> > >
> 
> > >   
> 
> > >
> 
> > > Second idea:
> 
> > >
> 
> > > The @PersistenceContext
> 
> > > qualifier has a @Nonbind attribute
> 
> > > persistenceUnitName which we can extract in the
> 
> > producer
> 
> > > method. But then we
> 
> > > get in scoping issues. Especially when having
> 
> > multiple
> 
> > > persistence-units within
> 
> > > one deployment. The second problem is: How can
> the
> 
> > > @Transactional annotation
> 
> > > know the persistence-unit-name.
> 
> > >
> 
> > >   
> 
> > >
> 
> > > Any other ideas?
> 
> > >
> 
> > >   
> 
> > >
> 
> > > Regards,
> 
> > >
> 
> > > Arne
> 
> > >
> 
> > >   
> 
> > >
> 
> > > --
> 
> > >
> 
> > >  
> 
> > >
> 
> > > Arne Limburg - Enterprise
> 
> > > Developer
> 
> > >
> 
> > > OpenKnowledge GmbH,
> 
> > > Oldenburg
> 
> > >
> 
> > > Bismarckstraße 13, 26122
> 
> > > Oldenburg
> 
> > >
> 
> > > Mobil: +49 (0) 151 - 108 22
> 
> > > 942
> 
> > >
> 
> > > Tel: +49 (0) 441 -
> 
> > > 4082-0
> 
> > >
> 
> > > Fax: +49 (0) 441 -
> 
> > > 4082-111
> 
> > >
> 
> > > arne.limburg@openknowledge.de
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > > http://www.openknowledge.de
> 
> 
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >   
> 
> > >
> 
> > > Registergericht: Amtsgericht
> 
> > > Oldenburg, HRB 4670
> 
> > >
> 
> > > Geschäftsführer: Lars
> 
> > > Röwekamp, Jens Schumann
> 
> > >
> 
> > >   
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > > Von: Gerhard Petracek
> 
> > > [mailto:gerhard.petracek@gmail.com]
> 
> >
> 
> > >
> 
> > > Gesendet: Samstag, 13. Februar 2010 14:32
> 
> > >
> 
> > > An: MyFaces Development
> 
> > >
> 
> > > Betreff: Re: [Ext-CDI] @Transactional
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >   
> 
> > >
> 
> > > hi arne,
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >   
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > > i used the EntityManager to get
> 
> > > an EntityTransaction.
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > > you have to use cdi to create and
> 
> > > inject it.
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > > (i used some producer methods.)
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > > i created @PersistenceUnit which
> 
> > > is a cdi qualifier and
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > > @Transactional which is a cdi
> 
> > > interceptor binding.
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >   
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > > basically it works and it isn't
> 
> > > hard to use.
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > > however, we have to think about an
> 
> > > approach to provide as
> 
> > > much as possible in a generic way.
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >   
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > > regards,
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > > gerhard
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >   
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > > http://www.irian.at
> 
> 
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> 
> > >
> 
> > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> 
> > >
> 
> > > Courses in English and German
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > > 
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > > 2010/2/13 Arne Limburg <arne.limburg@openknowledge.de>
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > > Hi
> 
> > > Gerhard,
> 
> > >
> 
> > >  
> 
> > >
> 
> > > Did
> 
> > > you mean „i used
> 
> > > UserTransaction”? If not, how do you receive
> your
> 
> > > EntityTransaction?
> 
> > >
> 
> > >  
> 
> > >
> 
> > > I am
> 
> > > working on a solution to
> 
> > > get request-scoped EntityManagers injected within
> a
> 
> > > servlet-container that does
> 
> > > not even support the web-profile (which are the
> 
> > current
> 
> > > jetty and the current
> 
> > > tomcat). I am not able to get an EntityManager
> 
> > injected via
> 
> > > @PersistenceContext
> 
> > > in that environment. So it would be nice if there
> were
> 
> > some
> 
> > > CDI-Extension to
> 
> > > achieve this. The implementation would be pretty
> 
> > > straight-forward except the
> 
> > > configuration of the persistence-unit name and
> the
> 
> > handling
> 
> > > of different
> 
> > > persistence-units within one CDI-deployment
> 
> > > unit.
> 
> > >
> 
> > >  
> 
> > >
> 
> > > Using
> 
> > > JTA-Transactions vs.
> 
> > > resource-local EntityTransactions is another
> issue
> 
> > > here.
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >  
> 
> > >
> 
> > > Regards,
> 
> > >
> 
> > > Arne
> 
> > >
> 
> > >  
> 
> > >
> 
> > > --
> 
> > >
> 
> > >  
> 
> > >
> 
> > > Arne
> 
> > > Limburg - Enterprise
> 
> > > Developer
> 
> > >
> 
> > > OpenKnowledge GmbH,
> 
> > > Oldenburg
> 
> > >
> 
> > > Bismarckstraße
> 
> > > 13, 26122 Oldenburg
> 
> > >
> 
> > > Mobil: +49 (0) 151
> 
> > > - 108 22 942
> 
> > >
> 
> > > Tel: +49 (0) 441 -
> 
> > > 4082-0
> 
> > >
> 
> > > Fax: +49 (0) 441 -
> 
> > > 4082-111
> 
> > >
> 
> > > arne.limburg@openknowledge.de
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > > http://www.openknowledge.de
> 
> > >
> 
> > >  
> 
> > >
> 
> > > Registergericht:
> 
> > > Amtsgericht Oldenburg,
> 
> > > HRB 4670
> 
> > >
> 
> > > Geschäftsführer:
> 
> > > Lars Röwekamp, Jens
> 
> > > Schumann
> 
> > >
> 
> > >  
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > > Von: Gerhard
> 
> > > Petracek [mailto:gerhard.petracek@gmail.com]
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > > Gesendet: Freitag, 12. Februar 2010 19:59
> 
> > >
> 
> > > An: MyFaces Development
> 
> > >
> 
> > > Betreff: Re: [Ext-CDI] @Transactional
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >  
> 
> > >
> 
> > > hi
> 
> > > arne,
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >  
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > > yes
> 
> > > - i used EntityTransaction in the prototype and
> it
> 
> > works
> 
> > > pretty well in a
> 
> > > servlet container (that was the base idea).
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >  
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > > regards,
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > > gerhard
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > > http://www.irian.at
> 
> 
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> 
> > >
> 
> > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> 
> > >
> 
> > > Courses in English and German
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > > 2010/2/12
> 
> > > Arne Limburg <arne.limburg@openknowledge.de>
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > > Hi
> 
> > > folks,
> 
> > >
> 
> > >  
> 
> > >
> 
> > > I saw the discussion of adding an
> 
> > > @Transactional-Annotation to your
> 
> > > CDI extensions. I think Gerhard wrote it. I
> wonder if
> 
> > it
> 
> > > deals with JTA
> 
> > > transactions (which indeed would be pretty
> 
> > > straight-forward) or with
> 
> > > EntityTransactions of an resource-local
> EntityManager.
> 
> > I am
> 
> > > working on the
> 
> > > latter one and just would want to know if someone
> else
> 
> > is
> 
> > > working on such
> 
> > > stuff. I think it would be great, when we could
> 
> > archive
> 
> > > injection of
> 
> > > resource-local EntityManagers with
> transaction-support
> 
> > to
> 
> > > deploy it on a tomcat
> 
> > > or jetty. What do you think?
> 
> > >
> 
> > >  
> 
> > >
> 
> > > Regards,
> 
> > >
> 
> > > Arne
> 
> > >
> 
> > >  
> 
> > >
> 
> > > --
> 
> > >
> 
> > >  
> 
> > >
> 
> > > Arne Limburg - Enterprise
> 
> > > Developer
> 
> > >
> 
> > > OpenKnowledge GmbH, Oldenburg
> 
> > >
> 
> > > Bismarckstraße
> 
> > > 13, 26122 Oldenburg
> 
> > >
> 
> > > Mobil:
> 
> > > +49 (0) 151 - 108 22 942
> 
> > >
> 
> > > Tel:
> 
> > > +49 (0) 441 - 4082-0
> 
> > >
> 
> > > Fax:
> 
> > > +49 (0) 441 - 4082-111
> 
> > >
> 
> > > arne.limburg@openknowledge.de
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > > http://www.openknowledge.de
> 
> 
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >  
> 
> > >
> 
> > > Registergericht:
> 
> > > Amtsgericht Oldenburg, HRB 4670
> 
> > >
> 
> > > Geschäftsführer:
> 
> > > Lars Röwekamp, Jens Schumann
> 
> > >
> 
> > >  
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >  
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >   
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > > 
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> > __________________________________________________
> 
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> 
> > Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen
> 
> > herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails.
> 
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> 
> >
> 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> 
> Do You Yahoo!?
> 
> Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen
> herausragenden Schutz gegen
> Massenmails.
> 
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails.

http://mail.yahoo.com 

Mime
View raw message