myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [Trinidad2] FacesBean and JSF 2.0
Date Tue, 13 Oct 2009 20:07:35 GMT
Hello,

I now applied Max's patch to Trinidad 2.0.0 branch ([1]).

Have fun!

-Matthias

[1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/branches/trinidad-2.0.x

On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:48 AM, Max Starets <max.starets@oracle.com> wrote:
> Martin,
>
> Martin Kočí wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> why I asked about partial state saving is compile-time dependency on
> facelets 1.1.X in TrinidadComponentHandler and StateManagerImpl, both on
> PARAM_BUILD_BEFORE_RESTORE param. With mojarra 2  jsf-impl and facelets
> 1.1.x cannot be deployed concurrently.
>
>
> This code will be commented out in my patch. It will all be sorted out when
> we integrate Trinidad's partial state
> saving with JSF 2.0.
>
> Few thoughts on facelets2 and trinidad2 :
>
> - change tr.taglib.xml and trh.taglib.xml root element (generated with
> maven  plugin?) to:
>
> <facelet-taglib xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee"
>               xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
>               xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee
> http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee/web-facelettaglibary_2_0.xsd"
>               version="2.0">
>
> - rewrite TrinidadFaceletViewHandler (if it is still needed) to
> ViewDefinitionLanguage
>
>
> It is going away.
>
> - drop old facelets code  from TrinidadComponentHandler,
> StateManagerImpl and TrinidadListenersTagRule and dependency from
> pom.xml
>
> - and sure more but I'm not familiar with facelets
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Martin Koci
>
>
> Max Starets píše v Pá 09. 10. 2009 v 16:50 -0400:
>
>
> Martin,
>
> I agree we should look at integrating JSF 2.0 partial state saving into
> Trinidad seamlessly.
> It would not jump to conclusions about FaceBean just yet though.
>
> I am currently working on getting the branch to compile and run with JSF
> 2.0 (pretty much along the lines
> that you were suggesting in your previous e-mail).
>
> I will enter a JIRA for that and submit a patch probably on Monday. Once
> we get to a point where we can build
> and test, we should start looking at features like partial state saving.
>
> Regards,
> Max Starets
>
> Martin Koc(í wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> for Trinidad2: should we deprecate FacesBean and use StateHelper
> instead? I think it is the same idea:
>
> http://myfaces.apache.org/trinidad/trinidad-api/apidocs/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/bean/FacesBean.html
>
> https://javaserverfaces.dev.java.net/nonav/docs/2.0/javadocs/javax/faces/component/StateHelper.html
> https://javaserverfaces.dev.java.net/nonav/docs/2.0/javadocs/javax/faces/component/PartialStateHolder.html
>
> Concept is related to state saving and I think we should force Trinidad2
> to use partial state saving from JSF 2.0 because that was inspired by
> trinidad. Am I right?
>
>
> Martin
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

Mime
View raw message