Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 21947 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2009 02:24:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 2009 02:24:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 63215 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 02:24:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-dev-archive@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 63141 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2009 02:24:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@myfaces.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "MyFaces Development" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 63133 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2009 02:24:37 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 02:24:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lu4242@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.177 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.177] (HELO mail-vw0-f177.google.com) (209.85.212.177) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 02:24:24 +0000 Received: by vwj7 with SMTP id 7so4651073vwj.32 for ; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 19:24:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=gR63u5TMpPbtRQ4awHGqkaTZ4GJDw5rPLKocAkTPA0o=; b=XR38aussh0faWQDX1jWkHOVmD7tnE8O3XWJP4bqIJeiDbYsIxKZDjR1RlKrSrUJjq8 FaPIEBVwSp68EcxcbPlRoOMPujRgBcA0i7neBNfWcCpuVOsyhIxiWwE3B4EoTZisdAT/ gS7GYL4wygjGsVzgYF/6TjIUro7HfRHmmypTE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=qPBmucUAVgik6954nYo34MuV6T0L0LafpV04wco0zu3K48aXdNiBO/8/Z5BVlb9S5u 5mgKLClu7aKoEqMMOF7OVjRaK1jJa1cSkOBTHZhfGAArpTaEIJcEpZKuMJ3u4pGJ+Tzr PRaMVjZEr3OekLZHtQBQ+9b4phWZDWRwKh2to= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.77.17 with SMTP id e17mr361730vck.3.1247106241505; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 19:24:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <254acf980905280557w7de06f33re820a830b729e277@mail.gmail.com> References: <71235db40905220827w5399a59ev53aead9487c1acef@mail.gmail.com> <710c455d0905221210y654b71c2o1459acb8dcff24f7@mail.gmail.com> <71235db40905262322t3ee79a5cy59df38d54695fab4@mail.gmail.com> <1a681ff20905270053m22b13a39w546e7afead409734@mail.gmail.com> <8c9d4eaa0905270106n572e27e5i8d8a0ab46ffec1e0@mail.gmail.com> <71235db40905272323u458753bfi97ba392a8ef2bc4b@mail.gmail.com> <254acf980905280557w7de06f33re820a830b729e277@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 21:24:01 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] SVN structure change (was: Re: [MyFaces CORE] SVN layout (was: Re: [source control] git and the ASF ...)) From: Leonardo Uribe To: MyFaces Development Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64eabf485a8e1046e3c8cd5 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e64eabf485a8e1046e3c8cd5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Myfaces core 1.2.7 and 1.1.7 were released. So we can close this vote and make the necessary changes. Just to note it, after reading all previous emails the suggested layout is this: /trunk -> 2.0 /branches/1.1.x /branches/1.2.x If no objections I'll do the necessary changes on svn (note that to do this change we need to update nightly build configuration and I can't help with that). regards Leonardo Uribe 2009/5/28 Simon Lessard > +1 > > > On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 2:23 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > >> sure! >> >> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 6:34 AM, Leonardo Uribe wrote: >> > +1, but just a small suggestion. Right now I'm running the necessary >> steps >> > for release myfaces core 1.2.7, core 1.1.7, so I would like if it is >> > possible to delay this change after the release. >> > >> > regards >> > >> > Leonardo Uribe >> > >> > 2009/5/27 Cagatay Civici >> >> >> >> +1 for sure >> >> >> >> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Bruno Aranda >> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> +1 sounds good to me >> >>> >> >>> 2009/5/27 Matthias Wessendorf : >> >>> > so, there are no objections in making the MyFaces 2.0 efforts become >> >>> > trunk ? >> >>> > >> >>> > -Matthias >> >>> > >> >>> > On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Bernd Bohmann >> >>> > wrote: >> >>> >> Hello, >> >>> >> >> >>> >> +1 >> >>> >> >> >>> >> I would prefer >> >>> >> >> >>> >> /trunk -> 2.0 >> >>> >> /branches/myfaces-1.1.x >> >>> >> /branches/myfaces-1.2.x >> >>> >> >> >>> >> because we are not using cvs anymore >> >>> >> >> >>> >> and the path already contains >> >>> >> >> >>> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/ >> >>> >> >> >>> >> maybe we can omit the 'myfaces' in the branch name. >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Regards >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Bernd >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Matthias Wessendorf >> >>> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> actually, I agree with Bernd. >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> For the following layout: >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> /trunk -> 2.0 >> >>> >>> /branches/myfaces_1_1_x >> >>> >>> /branches/myfaces_1_2_x >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> Two reasons for way making 2.0 trunk: >> >>> >>> -most current development is on-going in 2.0 (new spec) >> >>> >>> -most commits are going to the 2.0 branch (so, let's make it >> trunk) >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> So, I am +1 on the above "svn layout" >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> -Matthias >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Matthias Wessendorf >> >>> >>> wrote: >> >>> >>>> from Bernd, on a different thread: >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> Hello, >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> I would suggest following layout >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> 1.1.x branch/1.1.x >> >>> >>>> 1.2.x branch/1.2.x >> >>> >>>> 2.0.x trunk >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> because the 2.0.x version is in development the other branches >> are >> >>> >>>> only in bugfix state. >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Werner Punz < >> werner.punz@gmail.com> >> >>> >>>> wrote: >> >>> >>>>> Matthias Wessendorf schrieb: >> >>> >>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>> Hi, >> >>> >>>>>> ... >> >>> >>>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>>> Ok, I filed this: >> >>> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2053 >> >>> >>>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>>> maybe we should also think about making the JSF 1.1.x stuff a >> >>> >>>>>>> branch ... >> >>> >>>>>>> (since we already work on 2.0.x....) >> >>> >>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>> what do people think if the 1.2 stuff becomes "trunk" >> >>> >>>>>> And the following efforts are on a branch: >> >>> >>>>>> -2.0.x >> >>> >>>>>> -1.1.x >> >>> >>>>>> >> >>> >>>>> +1 >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> -- >> >>> >>>> Matthias Wessendorf >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> >>> >>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> >>> >>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> -- >> >>> >>> Matthias Wessendorf >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> >>> >>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> >>> >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > -- >> >>> > Matthias Wessendorf >> >>> > >> >>> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> >>> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> >>> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> >>> > >> >> >> > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> > > --0016e64eabf485a8e1046e3c8cd5 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi

Myfaces core 1.2.7 and 1.1.7 were released. So we can close this = vote and make the necessary changes. Just to note it, after reading all pre= vious emails the suggested layout is this:

/trunk -> 2.0
/branches/1.1.x
/branches/1.2.x

If no objections I'll do the necessary changes o= n svn (note that to do this change we need to update nightly build configur= ation and I can't help with that).

regards

Leonardo Uribe=


2009/5/28 Simon Lessard <simon.lessard.3@gmail.co= m>
+1


On T= hu, May 28, 2009 at 2:23 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org>= ; wrote:
sure!

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 6:34 AM, Leonardo Uribe <lu4242@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1, but just a small suggestion. Right now I'm running the necessa= ry steps
> for release myfaces core 1.2.7, core 1.1.7, so I would like if it is > possible to delay this change after the release.
>
> regards
>
> Leonardo Uribe
>
> 2009/5/27 Cagatay Civici <cagatay.civici@gmail.com>
>>
>> +1 for sure
>>
>> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Bruno Aranda <brunoaranda@gmail.com> >> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1 sounds good to me
>>>
>>> 2009/5/27 Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org>:
>>> > so, there are no objections in making the MyFaces 2.0 eff= orts become
>>> > trunk ?
>>> >
>>> > -Matthias
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Bernd Bohmann
>>> > <bernd.bohmann@atanion.com> wrote:
>>> >> Hello,
>>> >>
>>> >> +1
>>> >>
>>> >> I would prefer
>>> >>
>>> >> /trunk -> 2.0
>>> >> /branches/myfaces-1.1.x
>>> >> /branches/myfaces-1.2.x
>>> >>
>>> >> because we are not using cvs anymore
>>> >>
>>> >> and the path already contains
>>> >>
>>> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/ >>> >>
>>> >> maybe we can omit the 'myfaces' in the branch= name.
>>> >>
>>> >> Regards
>>> >>
>>> >> Bernd
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Matthias Wessendorf<= br> >>> >> <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
>>> >>> actually, I agree with Bernd.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> For the following layout:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> /trunk -> 2.0
>>> >>> /branches/myfaces_1_1_x
>>> >>> /branches/myfaces_1_2_x
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Two reasons for way making 2.0 trunk:
>>> >>> -most current development is on-going in 2.0 (new= spec)
>>> >>> -most commits are going to the 2.0 branch (so, le= t's make it trunk)
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> So, I am +1 on the above "svn layout" >>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> -Matthias
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Matthias Wessend= orf
>>> >>> <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
>>> >>>> from Bernd, on a different thread:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Hello,
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> I would suggest following layout
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> 1.1.x branch/1.1.x
>>> >>>> 1.2.x branch/1.2.x
>>> >>>> 2.0.x trunk
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> because the 2.0.x version is in development t= he other branches are
>>> >>>> only in bugfix state.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Werner Punz = <werner.punz@= gmail.com>
>>> >>>> wrote:
>>> >>>>> Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> Hi,
>>> >>>>>> ...
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> Ok, I filed this:
>>> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jir= a/browse/INFRA-2053
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> maybe we should also think about = making the JSF 1.1.x stuff a
>>> >>>>>>> branch ...
>>> >>>>>>> (since we already work on 2.0.x..= ..)
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> what do people think if the 1.2 stuff= becomes "trunk"
>>> >>>>>> And the following efforts are on a br= anch:
>>> >>>>>> -2.0.x
>>> >>>>>> -1.1.x
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>> +1
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> --
>>> >>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> >>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf<= br> >>> >>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> --
>>> >>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>> >>>
>>> >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>> >>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Matthias Wessendorf
>>> >
>>> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>> >
>>
>
>



--


--0016e64eabf485a8e1046e3c8cd5--