myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Leonardo Uribe <lu4...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] SVN structure change (was: Re: [MyFaces CORE] SVN layout (was: Re: [source control] git and the ASF ...))
Date Thu, 09 Jul 2009 02:24:01 GMT
Hi

Myfaces core 1.2.7 and 1.1.7 were released. So we can close this vote and
make the necessary changes. Just to note it, after reading all previous
emails the suggested layout is this:

/trunk -> 2.0
/branches/1.1.x
/branches/1.2.x

If no objections I'll do the necessary changes on svn (note that to do this
change we need to update nightly build configuration and I can't help with
that).

regards

Leonardo Uribe


2009/5/28 Simon Lessard <simon.lessard.3@gmail.com>

> +1
>
>
> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 2:23 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org>wrote:
>
>> sure!
>>
>> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 6:34 AM, Leonardo Uribe <lu4242@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > +1, but just a small suggestion. Right now I'm running the necessary
>> steps
>> > for release myfaces core 1.2.7, core 1.1.7, so I would like if it is
>> > possible to delay this change after the release.
>> >
>> > regards
>> >
>> > Leonardo Uribe
>> >
>> > 2009/5/27 Cagatay Civici <cagatay.civici@gmail.com>
>> >>
>> >> +1 for sure
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Bruno Aranda <brunoaranda@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> +1 sounds good to me
>> >>>
>> >>> 2009/5/27 Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org>:
>> >>> > so, there are no objections in making the MyFaces 2.0 efforts become
>> >>> > trunk ?
>> >>> >
>> >>> > -Matthias
>> >>> >
>> >>> > On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Bernd Bohmann
>> >>> > <bernd.bohmann@atanion.com> wrote:
>> >>> >> Hello,
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> +1
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> I would prefer
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> /trunk -> 2.0
>> >>> >> /branches/myfaces-1.1.x
>> >>> >> /branches/myfaces-1.2.x
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> because we are not using cvs anymore
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> and the path already contains
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> maybe we can omit the 'myfaces' in the branch name.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Regards
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Bernd
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Matthias Wessendorf
>> >>> >> <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
>> >>> >>> actually, I agree with Bernd.
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> For the following layout:
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> /trunk -> 2.0
>> >>> >>> /branches/myfaces_1_1_x
>> >>> >>> /branches/myfaces_1_2_x
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> Two reasons for way making 2.0 trunk:
>> >>> >>> -most current development is on-going in 2.0 (new spec)
>> >>> >>> -most commits are going to the 2.0 branch (so, let's make
it
>> trunk)
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> So, I am +1 on the above "svn layout"
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> -Matthias
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Matthias Wessendorf
>> >>> >>> <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
>> >>> >>>> from Bernd, on a different thread:
>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>>> Hello,
>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>>> I would suggest following layout
>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>>> 1.1.x branch/1.1.x
>> >>> >>>> 1.2.x branch/1.2.x
>> >>> >>>> 2.0.x trunk
>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>>> because the 2.0.x version is in development the other
branches
>> are
>> >>> >>>> only in bugfix state.
>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>>> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Werner Punz <
>> werner.punz@gmail.com>
>> >>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>> >>>>> Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
>> >>> >>>>>>
>> >>> >>>>>> Hi,
>> >>> >>>>>> ...
>> >>> >>>>>>>
>> >>> >>>>>>> Ok, I filed this:
>> >>> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2053
>> >>> >>>>>>>
>> >>> >>>>>>> maybe we should also think about making
the JSF 1.1.x stuff a
>> >>> >>>>>>> branch ...
>> >>> >>>>>>> (since we already work on 2.0.x....)
>> >>> >>>>>>
>> >>> >>>>>> what do people think if the 1.2 stuff becomes
"trunk"
>> >>> >>>>>> And the following efforts are on a branch:
>> >>> >>>>>> -2.0.x
>> >>> >>>>>> -1.1.x
>> >>> >>>>>>
>> >>> >>>>> +1
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>>> --
>> >>> >>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> >>> >>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> >>> >>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> --
>> >>> >>> Matthias Wessendorf
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> >>> >>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> >>> >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > --
>> >>> > Matthias Wessendorf
>> >>> >
>> >>> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> >>> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> >>> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>> >>> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>
>

Mime
View raw message