myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Manfred Geiler <manfred.gei...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] SVN structure change (was: Re: [MyFaces CORE] SVN layout (was: Re: [source control] git and the ASF ...))
Date Thu, 09 Jul 2009 06:20:49 GMT
+1
thanks leonardo
--Manfred

On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 04:24, Leonardo Uribe<lu4242@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Myfaces core 1.2.7 and 1.1.7 were released. So we can close this vote and
> make the necessary changes. Just to note it, after reading all previous
> emails the suggested layout is this:
>
> /trunk -> 2.0
> /branches/1.1.x
> /branches/1.2.x
>
> If no objections I'll do the necessary changes on svn (note that to do this
> change we need to update nightly build configuration and I can't help with
> that).
>
> regards
>
> Leonardo Uribe
>
>
> 2009/5/28 Simon Lessard <simon.lessard.3@gmail.com>
>>
>> +1
>>
>> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 2:23 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> sure!
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 6:34 AM, Leonardo Uribe <lu4242@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > +1, but just a small suggestion. Right now I'm running the necessary
>>> > steps
>>> > for release myfaces core 1.2.7, core 1.1.7, so I would like if it is
>>> > possible to delay this change after the release.
>>> >
>>> > regards
>>> >
>>> > Leonardo Uribe
>>> >
>>> > 2009/5/27 Cagatay Civici <cagatay.civici@gmail.com>
>>> >>
>>> >> +1 for sure
>>> >>
>>> >> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Bruno Aranda <brunoaranda@gmail.com>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> +1 sounds good to me
>>> >>>
>>> >>> 2009/5/27 Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org>:
>>> >>> > so, there are no objections in making the MyFaces 2.0 efforts
>>> >>> > become
>>> >>> > trunk ?
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > -Matthias
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Bernd Bohmann
>>> >>> > <bernd.bohmann@atanion.com> wrote:
>>> >>> >> Hello,
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> +1
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> I would prefer
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> /trunk -> 2.0
>>> >>> >> /branches/myfaces-1.1.x
>>> >>> >> /branches/myfaces-1.2.x
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> because we are not using cvs anymore
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> and the path already contains
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> maybe we can omit the 'myfaces' in the branch name.
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> Regards
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> Bernd
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Matthias Wessendorf
>>> >>> >> <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
>>> >>> >>> actually, I agree with Bernd.
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>> For the following layout:
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>> /trunk -> 2.0
>>> >>> >>> /branches/myfaces_1_1_x
>>> >>> >>> /branches/myfaces_1_2_x
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>> Two reasons for way making 2.0 trunk:
>>> >>> >>> -most current development is on-going in 2.0 (new spec)
>>> >>> >>> -most commits are going to the 2.0 branch (so, let's
make it
>>> >>> >>> trunk)
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>> So, I am +1 on the above "svn layout"
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>> -Matthias
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>> On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Matthias Wessendorf
>>> >>> >>> <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
>>> >>> >>>> from Bernd, on a different thread:
>>> >>> >>>>
>>> >>> >>>> Hello,
>>> >>> >>>>
>>> >>> >>>> I would suggest following layout
>>> >>> >>>>
>>> >>> >>>> 1.1.x branch/1.1.x
>>> >>> >>>> 1.2.x branch/1.2.x
>>> >>> >>>> 2.0.x trunk
>>> >>> >>>>
>>> >>> >>>> because the 2.0.x version is in development the
other branches
>>> >>> >>>> are
>>> >>> >>>> only in bugfix state.
>>> >>> >>>>
>>> >>> >>>>
>>> >>> >>>>
>>> >>> >>>>
>>> >>> >>>> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Werner Punz
>>> >>> >>>> <werner.punz@gmail.com>
>>> >>> >>>> wrote:
>>> >>> >>>>> Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
>>> >>> >>>>>>
>>> >>> >>>>>> Hi,
>>> >>> >>>>>> ...
>>> >>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>> >>>>>>> Ok, I filed this:
>>> >>> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2053
>>> >>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>> >>>>>>> maybe we should also think about making
the JSF 1.1.x stuff a
>>> >>> >>>>>>> branch ...
>>> >>> >>>>>>> (since we already work on 2.0.x....)
>>> >>> >>>>>>
>>> >>> >>>>>> what do people think if the 1.2 stuff becomes
"trunk"
>>> >>> >>>>>> And the following efforts are on a branch:
>>> >>> >>>>>> -2.0.x
>>> >>> >>>>>> -1.1.x
>>> >>> >>>>>>
>>> >>> >>>>> +1
>>> >>> >>>>>
>>> >>> >>>>>
>>> >>> >>>>
>>> >>> >>>>
>>> >>> >>>>
>>> >>> >>>> --
>>> >>> >>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>> >>> >>>>
>>> >>> >>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> >>> >>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> >>> >>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>> >>> >>>>
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>> --
>>> >>> >>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> >>> >>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> >>> >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > --
>>> >>> > Matthias Wessendorf
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> >>> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> >>> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>> >>> >
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>
>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>
>

Mime
View raw message