Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 37794 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2009 12:06:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Apr 2009 12:06:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 57346 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2009 12:06:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-dev-archive@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 57249 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2009 12:06:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@myfaces.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "MyFaces Development" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 57240 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2009 12:06:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 12:06:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gcjmu-myfaces-dev@m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.2 as permitted sender) Received: from [80.91.229.2] (HELO ciao.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 12:06:49 +0000 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Lrt1T-0004Fa-5a for dev@myfaces.apache.org; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 12:06:23 +0000 Received: from cm56-216-195.liwest.at ([86.56.216.195]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 12:06:23 +0000 Received: from werner.punz by cm56-216-195.liwest.at with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 12:06:23 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: dev@myfaces.apache.org From: Werner Punz Subject: Re: JSF2.0 Ajax Code Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 14:06:12 +0200 Lines: 102 Message-ID: References: <71235db40904090444i61baa299j6a698c7ec5271a23@mail.gmail.com> <1a681ff20904090459h251c1117hf458b278d1773d97@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cm56-216-195.liwest.at User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421) In-Reply-To: <1a681ff20904090459h251c1117hf458b278d1773d97@mail.gmail.com> Sender: news X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ok jira is the way to go then even for the initial combined code commit tomorrow... Cheers Werner Bruno Aranda schrieb: > Though it is really cool you are doing all this job, I believe that the > way to go is to do it through JIRA. For instance, I have close to no > spare time for JSF these days but I really enjoying following the > development of the JSF 2.0 implementation through JIRA. I think that > offline discussions make the subject more difficult to understand for > the rest and even if the task is done effectively keeping others from > the loop may harm the project when those who implemented the thing > offline cannot help anymore to its maintenance. People comes and goes, > so having in JIRA makes it very convenient. > > If it is not possible, I would at least create the JIRA issue containing > the big changes and explaining what it does. At least it will be in the > release notes... > > Thanks for the work! > > Bruno > > 2009/4/9 Werner Punz > > > Ok I need one exception to this rule. > I have done a load of work with our combined codebases offline > and also I am doing a full package reorg as we speak. > This would mean > > a) Either push the entire codebase into the jira (a diff is > pointless there is almost no file at the same place) > > or > > b) Doing one commit outside of the jira with references that this is > a shared codebase > > Cheers > > Werner > > > > Matthias Wessendorf schrieb: > > c) > that is *the* way to go. > The contributors can upload a patch (visible to everybody that is > interested) and a committer is free to take it and move it over > to the source code. Also this way allows a much better feedback > process... > > a) and b) imply too much offline work... > exchanging patches behind hidden doors is not the way that a > good and > intact community wants to go. > > -Matthias > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Werner Punz > > wrote: > > Hello > > I just got the last ICLA confirmation missing, now following. > We are still at work, ganesh and alex are working on their > codebase, > since they do not have committer rights we have to do some > workflow > adjustment. > > I would propose following: > > > a) I am working today and tomorrow still on the combined > codebase cleanup, > and will commit tomorrow my codebase into the ASF repo! > > b) Alex and Ganesh can work on theirs, Either I fetch the > changes myself > and commit them with acknowlegdgement > > or > > c) We go the jira route, which personally is for me the way > which causes > more work because I constantly have to apply patches instead! > > I personally would vote for b) what is the consensous on this? > > > > > > > >