myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org>
Subject Re: f:ajax and MyFaces extensions
Date Wed, 22 Apr 2009 06:00:11 GMT
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 7:54 AM, Werner Punz <werner.punz@gmail.com> wrote:
> Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Werner Punz <werner.punz@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Actually We probably can provide a non facelets based solution
>>> under the myfaces umbrella, tomahawk, extensions or impl I donĀ“t care
>>> but I am definitely sure we will be unable to provide it under
>>> the standard f: tags...
>>>
>>> +1 for a non facelet based solution...
>>
>> As I was thinking about this bit more. I think we are now there that
>> JSP is officially (almost) dead. When you want to upgrade, by
>> simple replacing the JARs, this will work. Moving forward in your
>> project, by using the new introduced stuff, you have to use Facelets.
>>
>> So, I am +1 for what Ganesh proposed (=> CORE)
>>
>> I am not against an tomahawk:ajax tag, for JSP, if one want's that.
>>
>>
> I am still -1 regarding a pure facelet based one, JSF is not dead, it is not
> smelling yet...

no, but JSP

> Seriously most projects use facelets nowadays but I would not call JSP dead,

but they EG decided to add new things (e.g. f:ajax) only to the facelets view.

-M

> besides that the new component api simplifies things anyway, so it is not
> that hard to provide something on api level.
>
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

Mime
View raw message