myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org>
Subject Re: myfaces 2.0 really java6?
Date Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:12:09 GMT
good news, werner :-)

http://markmail.org/message/ir6p5hu35vjznatv

-M

On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Werner Punz <werner.punz@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Werner Punz <werner.punz@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Well I can live with it although I dont see too much reason to target
>>>>> java6
>>>>> codewise, since we do not use too many new features of it extensively
>>>>> (In january it was just one data structure which replaced the old Stack
>>>>> data
>>>>> structure that was it).
>>>>>
>>>>> I think we should target java5 still in our core codebase to allow the
>>>>> integration into jee5 based servlet runners.
>>>>> Although JEE6 will come out in summer probably, JEE5 will be the defacto
>>>>
>>>> they changed that date to September..
>>>>
>>>>> base for the years to come, since the migration from jee4 to jee5 happens
>>>>> as
>>>>> we speak by now!
>>>>
>>>> I doubt that much vendors will add additional support for JSF 2 in
>>>> their existing
>>>> JavaEE 5 environments
>>>>
>>> Well a not totally unimportant userbase is the one, who integrates the jsf
>>> core into tomcat or other servlet runners.
>>> Some of them if not many of them will be stuck on JDK5 for political
>>> reasons. :-)
>>>
>>> As much as I love to target the latest technology, I think for a core
>>> framework we should be a tad more conservative, but as I said that
>>> is just my 2c regarding the entire situation. Especially since targetting
>>> JDK5 does not induce pain like it did with JDK4 when everyone finally wanted
>>> to get up to JDK5 for various reasons regarding the language extensions :-)
>>
>> yes, I know. I have never that I want to have JSE 6, I just want to reflect the
>> spec requirements correctly. Let me ping the folks on the RI dev-list for that
>> type of q.
>
> http://markmail.org/message/pgzsrexxf6ftmvju
>
>>
>> -M
>>
>>>
>>> As I said just a personal opinion, nothing more!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

Mime
View raw message