Mailing-List: contact dev-help@myfaces.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "MyFaces Development" <dev@myfaces.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mwessendorf@gmail.com
 designates 216.239.58.185 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition
         :references:x-google-sender-auth;
        b=AEIZhbAFb1CHeYXZZkBlMD4ihWuqzL7mMa6Vo60+0DrooaZNtMwJBLPDCvXxNCqHBw
         8YJZlrLUSQ8GBFtW5T4nXmBeEwnbO8p9XwmN+PzoAvU5E+W/iOXNCzqMpjgqslHNbxkY
         El8pvMWPSGFaH0nSmfFUFhLQOP5z2uC7RRWQ4=
Message-ID: <71235db40806240909q6e66c27evf9df7f6c3d46f3cc@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 09:09:19 -0700
From: "Matthias Wessendorf" <matzew@apache.org>
Sender: mwessendorf@gmail.com
To: "MyFaces Development" <dev@myfaces.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Time for an Orchestra 1.2 release?
In-Reply-To: <486116AD.3040100@chello.at>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <486116AD.3040100@chello.at>

Hello Simon,

On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 8:45 AM, simon.kitching@chello.at
<simon.kitching@chello.at> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm about to start working on a new Orchestra feature (basic "dialog
> support").
>
> It therefore seems a good idea to get an Orchestra release out before I
> start messing with the trunk. In particular, there are two bugs which are
> fixed in trunk and would be good to have in an official release:
>  * ORCHESTRA-21 Issue with weird urls (esp. ones created by Trinidad)
>  * ORCHESTRA-23 (locking bug, triggered by ajax or double-click)

+1

>
> There are also a couple of minor enhancements, but not much has really
> happened since the 1.1 release.
>
> As always, there is more we *could* do; there are a couple of open bug
> issues. But none of them are simple to tackle, so I'd rather get 1.2 out now
> and tackle the other issues (esp. portlets) at some later time.
>
> I've created a release branch in svn, and taken out a few things that are
> not completely baked in trunk. The resulting code is binary compatible with
> 1.1 except in one minor case that I don't think we need to worry about. But
> see the RELEASE-NOTES.txt file for details.
>
> Unless there are any objections, I'll create an RC in the next few days.

sounds good to me!

Greetings,
Matthias

>
> Cheers,
> Simon
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org