myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Scott O'Bryan" <darkar...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Trinidad] missing sources from 1.08 distrib ?
Date Tue, 27 May 2008 16:53:34 GMT
I suppose if it makes you feel better, I can manually reconstruct the 
dist package based on the deployed maven artifacts in the release, but 
like I say, when I generated the review artifacts in the first place, it 
was essentially a faux-release taken directly from the tag.

Scott

Scott O'Bryan wrote:
> Simon,
>
> I think the screw up was on my end.  Let me try to explain.  Once the 
> release passed, I messed up the copy over to the repositories for the 
> dist artifacts, so I took the copies that I had built locally and 
> uploaded them.  This upload is what failed.  I should have checked the 
> upload better.  The artifacts on my local machine have been deleted.
>
> That said, the tag needs to be able to re-generate the artifacts.  
> It's integral to the release process because, when the release is 
> finally performed by maven, it is a clean copy of the tag which is 
> built and deployed to the staging directories, not the artifacts built 
> for the vote.  I know in the case of 1.0.8 and 1.2.8 the tag will 
> regenerate the artifacts as they are supposed to be because when I 
> build those artifacts in the first place, I used a clean tag. The 
> binaries are simply zips of these artifacts and must be manually 
> generated using maven.
>
> Scott
>
> simon.kitching@chello.at wrote:
>> Hi Scott,
>>
>> [redirecting from users to dev list]
>>
>> Sorry but I don't understand why regeneration of these files is needed,
>> or how a corrupt file occurred at all.
>>
>> The release candidate ".tar.gz" and ".zip" files were placed under
>> someone's home directory on people.apache.org for review right? And if
>> the release vote passed, then presumably people *had* tested that they
>> were ok. If a release vote had passed without anyone detecting that a
>> .zip file was truncated then there is something seriously wrong with the
>> release checking process....
>>
>> And after the release vote passed, the release candidate jars were
>> copied from someone's home directory to the distribution directory, from
>> where they get replicated to the mirrors, yes?
>>
>> So firstly, I don't understand how they could get corrupted with just a
>> local copy from one dir of people.apache.org to another.
>>
>> And secondly, why can't that approved (and uncorrupt) release candidate
>> zip file just be used rather than regenerating from the tag? Have the
>> release candidate files already been deleted from their review place on
>> people.apache.org?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Simon
>>
>> Scott O'Bryan schrieb:
>>  
>>> Simon,  they are, and thats where I pull them from.  But we had an
>>> issue blocking the release at one point and I had to regenerate 
>>> them. It looks like the trasfer failed in my staging directory.
>>>
>>> The maven artifacts are fine, it's just the distributables and only in
>>> 1.0.8.
>>>
>>> Scott
>>>
>>> On May 27, 2008, at 6:55 AM, "simon.kitching@chello.at"
>>> <simon.kitching@chello.at> wrote:
>>>
>>>    
>>>> Hi Scott,
>>>>
>>>> Are the original artifacts still available at the location they were
>>>> published for release candidate review?
>>>>
>>>> If so, it would be nicer to just use those rather than regenerate the
>>>> zip.
>>>>
>>>> But I suppose as long as the unpacked zip contents match the unpacked
>>>> tar.gz contents that is a reasonable check that the rebuild worked ok.
>>>> Probably best followed up on the dev list..
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Simon
>>>>
>>>> Scott O'Bryan schrieb:
>>>>      
>>>>> Ok, apparently something must have happened in the transfer. Let me
>>>>> regenerate the artifacts from the tag.
>>>>>
>>>>> On May 27, 2008, at 1:20 AM, Renzo Tomaselli
>>>>> <renzo.tomaselli@tecnotp.it> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>        
>>>>>> Scott, even more: file trinidad-1.0.8-dist.zip appears truncated
and
>>>>>> invalid (just 3.3 MB), while trinidad-1.0.8-dist.tar.gz is ok (10

>>>>>> MB).
>>>>>> I tried to download from several mirrors, same result.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- Renzo
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Scott O'Bryan wrote:
>>>>>>          
>>>>>>> Really! That's wired. Let me take a look at it tomorrow and I'll
>>>>>>> regenerate the jars if I need to.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On May 26, 2008, at 12:20 PM, Renzo Tomaselli
>>>>>>> <renzo.tomaselli@tecnotp.it> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>            
>>>>>>>> Hi, just upgraded from 1.07 to 1.08. The source jar
>>>>>>>> trinidad-1.0.8-src-all.zip appear to miss quite a number
of files.
>>>>>>>> I was looking for org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.component.UIXTable,
>>>>>>>> but that folder contains a reduced number of entries as 
>>>>>>>> compared to
>>>>>>>> the jar.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -- Renzo
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>             
>>
>>   
>


Mime
View raw message