myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Matthias Wessendorf" <mat...@apache.org>
Subject Re: UIInput.resetValue()
Date Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:03:56 GMT
but, a move to JSF 2 is MUCH bigger than to 1.2 (from 1.1)

-M

On Jan 15, 2008 9:57 AM, Simon Lessard <simon.lessard.3@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, which mean that I might make such propositions or support them, but I'm
> not the only member and I'm pretty such that some members see apparent
> backward compatibility to be a precept above anything else.
>
>
> ~ Simon
>
>
>
> On Jan 15, 2008 11:35 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
> > aren't you part of the EG ?
> > :-)
> > -M
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Jan 15, 2008 7:46 AM, Simon Lessard <simon.lessard.3@gmail.com > wrote:
> > > Personally, considering there's always backward compatibility issues
> anyway,
> > > I wouldn't mind seeing some new ones if it was to allow JSF to be much
> > > faster, easier to use and more extensible. Like standardizing FacesBean
> for
> > > instance. If done correctly, it would give a decent speed boost, allow
> > > easier and more intelligent state saving as well as many other goodies.
> I'd
> > > really like to see a way to extends the Lifecycle more easily as well,
> maybe
> > > implying standardization of the Phase classes. Maybe adding new phases
> as
> > > well like register resources occurring before render to push all
> > > dependencies in a rendering context and thus allowing all script
> references
> > > to be rendered in the head element thus respecting w3c. A coherence
> > > validation phase as well as a mean to execute a Callback on the whole
> tree
> > > (to implement custom phases for example) wouldn't be unwelcome either.
> > > Anyway, we'll see that in due time.
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > ~ Simon
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Jan 15, 2008 10:33 AM, Matthias Wessendorf < matzew@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > > nice...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Jan 15, 2008 7:23 AM, Manfred Geiler <manfred.geiler@gmail.com >
> wrote:
> > > > > On Jan 15, 2008 4:16 PM, Matthias Wessendorf < matzew@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > > > > We here can only talk... The spec itself is made behind closed
> doors
> > > ;-)
> > > > >
> > > > > Not really "closed"
> > > > > "ajar" would be a better word: at least everyone is allowed to
> comment
> > > > > on early drafts
> > > > >  ;-)
> > > > >
> > > > > --Manfred
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > >
> > > > further stuff:
> > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> >
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > further stuff:
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> >
>
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org

Mime
View raw message