myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Paul Spencer <pau...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [MyFaces 1.2.2] so... why is there no 1.2.1 (was: Re: svn commit: r613971 - /myfaces/core/branches/1_2_2prepare/)
Date Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:31:31 GMT
Because artifacts where published, even if that was not the intent, the 
version number should be consider used.

Paul Spencer

Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> On Jan 21, 2008 1:08 PM, Mike Kienenberger <mkienenb@gmail.com> wrote:
>> If something was publicly released as 1.2.1 already, then -- even if
>> it was pulled -- please do not release 1.2.1 again.
> 
> it wasn't released. Just the impl jars made it to public repo.
> which is (from the effect) close to a release ;-)
> 
> -M
> 
>> Skipping a version number might cause some questions on the list.
>> However, reusing a version number will result in the end user not
>> knowing if they have the "good version" or the "bad version", nor will
>> anyone who tries to help them debug issues.
>>
>>
>> On Jan 21, 2008 4:00 PM, Leonardo Uribe <lu4242@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> So we agree on 1.2.2?
>>>
> 
> 
> 


Mime
View raw message