myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Matthias Wessendorf" <mat...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Commons API JSF 1.2 only
Date Wed, 05 Dec 2007 22:57:43 GMT
nope; don't think so.
it's fine if we just start w/ 1.2 as base.
(I'll update your little common tomorrow)

If needed, someone will just do it on a branch
(or somewhere else)

-M

On Dec 5, 2007 11:54 PM, Andrew Robinson <andrew.rw.robinson@gmail.com> wrote:
> Want to restart the vote?
>
>
> On Dec 5, 2007 3:52 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
> > > All myfaces commons trunks -> 1.2
> > > 1.1 branch that is only maintained by those willing to perform back ports
> >
> > wasn't that what I said w/ compromise?
> > use JSF 1.2 as default, and when sb. cares, let
> > him port it back on a branch or what not;
> >
> > -M
> >
> >
> > >
> > > -Andrew
> > >
> > >
> > > On Dec 5, 2007 3:43 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > I think that is a good compromise;
> > > > by that we also can "filter" later on the interesting parts for 1.1
> > > > (which can be done, by those, that actually care on 1.1)
> > > >
> > > > which is easier... since the most do care on 1.2 (since it is a NEWER
api)
> > > >
> > > > -M
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Dec 5, 2007 11:39 PM, Bernd Bohmann <bernd.bohmann@atanion.com>
wrote:
> > > > > Ok,
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm fine if we are starting with 1.2 only. We can look for 1.1
> > > > > interesting parts later.
> > > > > But I don't like a commons jsf 1.2 only vote.
> > > > >
> > > > > Bernd
> > > > >
> > > > > Scott O'Bryan schrieb:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Bernd,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I do.  :)  Common's multi-part form handling (file uploads)
will need to
> > > > > > work in both a Portal and Servlet environment before something
like
> > > > > > Trinidad will be able to use it.  For this, I'm proposing that
such a
> > > > > > handler use the Configurator sub-system.  The configurator Subsystem
> > > > > > must override the ExternalContext which has changed a great
deal between
> > > > > > 1.1 and 1.2.  Having done multi-part form handling in Trinidad
for both
> > > > > > frameworks, I can tell you that a generic implementation of
this is
> > > > > > quite a bit different in both branches (largely because of the
> > > > > > setRequest() and setResponse() methods in 1.2).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Currently, Tobago, Trinidad 1.1 and Tomohawk all support multi-part
form
> > > > > > handing for servlets.  I don't see any reason why we should
change these
> > > > > > implementations.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Scott
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Bernd Bohmann wrote:
> > > > > >> -1
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> I don't see any reason why a commons fileupload should not
support 1.1
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Can someone define what commons API means?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Is this just a subproject of commons like commons validator
or commons
> > > > > >> converter?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Scott O'Bryan schrieb:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> +1
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Mario Ivankovits wrote:
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>> +1
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>> Lets make the myfaces commons JSF API an official
vote so we can have
> > > > > >>>>> a fixed time frame on this decision
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> +1 [ ] -- make JSF 1.2 the minimum requirement
for the new myfaces
> > > > > >>>>> commons project
> > > > > >>>>> +0 [ ] -- you don't mind supporting a 1.1 trunk
in addition to a 1.2
> > > > > >>>>> trunk
> > > > > >>>>> -1 [ ] -- you feel that 1.1 should be required
and why you feel that
> > > > > >>>>> it is needed
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> My vote: +1
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> -Andrew
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > >
> > > > further stuff:
> > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > further stuff:
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> >
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org

Mime
View raw message