Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 38179 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2007 09:05:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Nov 2007 09:05:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 61204 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2007 09:05:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-dev-archive@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 61170 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2007 09:05:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@myfaces.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "MyFaces Development" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 61159 invoked by uid 99); 29 Nov 2007 09:05:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 01:05:03 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mario@ops.co.at designates 194.152.182.1 as permitted sender) Received: from [194.152.182.1] (HELO mgate.ops.co.at) (194.152.182.1) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 09:05:07 +0000 Received: from smtp.ops.co.at (smtp.int.ops.co.at [172.27.0.4]) by mgate.ops.co.at (OPS Mail Gateway - authorized use only - NO UCE/UBE C=AT L=VIE) with ESMTP id 91527AFE3A for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 10:04:47 +0100 (CET) Received: by smtp.ops.co.at (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 302696E0BA8; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 10:04:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from [172.27.1.104] (lints2.int.ops.co.at [172.27.1.104]) by smtp.ops.co.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BBAB6E0443 for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 10:04:45 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <474E80AE.50606@ops.co.at> Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 10:04:46 +0100 From: Mario Ivankovits User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070418) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: MyFaces Development Subject: Re: [result][vote] start up the MyFaces Commons project References: <23131358.1196324032669.JavaMail.root@viefep18> <474E7988.1060909@ops.co.at> <71235db40711290040jc84e773ma031f63592646ece@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <71235db40711290040jc84e773ma031f63592646ece@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on smtp.ops.co.at X-Spam-Level: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Status: No, hits=-12.6 required=7.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,LOC_SPMSIG_2, SMILEY,TW_CF autolearn=ham version=2.64 Hi! > well, when we put in the converters/validators, we will also have faces-cfg > for them... > Yep, if we have separate projects we can have the faces-config.xml again. >> Regarding the sandbox: I'd like to suggest to use the tomahawk sandbox >> for myfaces land at all. Lets promote the tomahawk-sandbox one level >> higher - thats it. >> > > +1 no sandbox inside the "master" project. > Just to clarify, this means a -1 to my suggestion above, no? > For Trinidad Sandbox, I am planing to create it at the same level, > where projects > like tomahawk, trinidad or portlet-bridge are > Hmm .... and this again means to be a +1 to my suggestion ... I am confused now ;-) If you create it at the project level (which I proposed), why not simply move the tomahawk-sandbox up? Ciao, Mario