myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Matthias Wessendorf" <mat...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [Trinidad: VOTE] 1.2 current again
Date Tue, 27 Nov 2007 09:21:58 GMT
Andrew-

any plans to start on this?
I am about to provide the 1.2.4 release bits.
Perhaps, it is not a bad idea, to have the *restructuring* done after that ?

-Matthias

On Nov 20, 2007 5:12 AM, Andrew Robinson <andrew.rw.robinson@gmail.com> wrote:
> Summary of the vote:
>
> +1: 8
> 0: 0 (Matt altered his vote)
> -1: 0
>
> +1 votes:
> Andrew Robinson
> Grant Smith
> Martin Marinschek
> Scott O'Bryan
> Jeanne Waldman
> Matt Cooper
> Gary Kind
> Simon Lessard
>
> Jeanne,
>
> Since you handled the last 1.2.4 trunk creation and merge, could you
> chime in with how this would be best handled? I was thinking of the
> following:
>
> 1) update the WIKI with the new rule that committers are responsible
> for maintaining their changes in both the trunk and the 1.2 trunk.
> 2) when 1.2.4 is released:
> 2a) tag the trunk (1.0.5) to label a cut off point
> 2b) branch trunk_1.2.x from the 1.2.4 branch
> 3) perform "ubermerge" from 1.0.5 inception to the tag
> 4) inform committers that they must apply any trunk changes post-tag
> to the 1.2 trunk and any changes going forward to both if applicable
>
> Opinions?
>
>
> On 11/15/07, Andrew Robinson <andrew.rw.robinson@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Vote:
> >   Creation of https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk_1.2.x/
> >
> > Justification:
> > Once again trinidad lacking a trunk for 1.2 is giving me heartburn.
> > I have been making changes to 1.0.5 and to be nice, I wanted to put
> > them into 1.2 as well, but of course there is no home for 1.2.5 yet.
> > Unlike the last time this was brought up, we now have an existing
> > example as an argument to use as a standard:
> >
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/trunk_1.2.x/
> >
> > If it is good enough for core, should it not also be good enough for trinidad?
> >
> > Since "https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk/" would
> > remain untouched, this should remove any debates over JSF not being
> > supported.
> >
> > Benefits:
> > 1) 1.2 snapshots possible with continuum
> > 2) 1.2 is kept up to date
> > 3) easier merge during 1.2 release time and hopefully as a result a
> > more stable product
> >
> > -Andrew
> >
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org

Mime
View raw message