myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Andrew Robinson" <andrew.rw.robin...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [result][vote] start up the MyFaces Commons project
Date Mon, 29 Oct 2007 15:54:15 GMT
How about a new "ASF style" name instead of basic, commons or
something else that could be more easily misconstrued?

-A

On 10/29/07, Mike Kienenberger <mkienenb@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't think there's any hard rule that all projects have to be
> prefixed with MyFaces.
> But then, I also don't have any problem with it being associated with
> Tomahawk or MyFaces (in the name).
>
> On 10/29/07, Mario Ivankovits <mario@ops.co.at> wrote:
> > Hi!
> > > I agree that MyFaces Basics is too MyFaces-Core-esque.    Tomahawk
> > > Basics or JSF Basics would be better choices.
> > >
> > Hmmm ... I think the "MyFaces JSF Basics" is the only option then. As
> > far as I know the token "MyFaces" needs to be in there as it is a
> > project of the "MyFaces" project.
> >
> > Personally I think the token "tomahawk" suggest that the Basic module is
> > meant as something related to tomahawk only then.
> >
> > Also we should clearly state in the future that the term MyFaces does
> > not not necessarily mean a module works only with the MyFaces JSF
> > implementation nor with tomahawk only. But I think this is something we
> > already do as good as we can, e.g. with Apache MyFaces Trinidad, Apache
> > MyFaces Orchestra.
> > Btw, Tobago is an exception here, they call their project just Tobago
> > instead of "Apache MyFaces Tobago" as it should be ... I think.
> >
> > Ciao,
> > Mario
> >
> >
>

Mime
View raw message