myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Scott O'Bryan <darkar...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [PORTAL] Adding some components to JIRA
Date Thu, 18 Oct 2007 19:52:08 GMT
Yeah.  I like JSFPB but it doesn't matter to me.  I wasn't sweating the 
JSR-301 in JIRA too much because the decription of the project was 
accurate.  But if you're offering to fix it, I think it would be better.

Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> I like MFPB
>
> On 10/18/07, Manfred Geiler <manfred.geiler@gmail.com> wrote:
>   
>> Done.
>>
>> BTW, I remember a discussion about the Jira key "JSR301". Reason for
>> the discussion was that it's no ideal name, because there might be a
>> time after jsr 301...
>> Well, renaming a Jira key is not possible.
>> What I could do is create a knew Jira project and bulk move all issues.
>> But first we would have to find a proper key.
>> MFPB for MyFaces portlet bridge?
>> or JSFPB?
>> Other suggestions?
>>
>> --Manfred
>>
>>
>> On 10/18/07, Scott O'Bryan <darkarena@gmail.com> wrote:
>>     
>>> Sure Manfred.  If you would.  I can then go and assign the existing Jira
>>> tickets in the appropriate categories.
>>>
>>> BTW, thanks sooo much for all your help in this...
>>>
>>> Scott
>>>
>>> Manfred Geiler wrote:
>>>       
>>>> So, there would be 4 new Jira "components" for the bridge:
>>>>  api
>>>>  impl
>>>>  documentation
>>>>  testing
>>>>
>>>> right?
>>>> should I add them right now?
>>>>
>>>> --Manfred
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 10/18/07, Scott O'Bryan <darkarena@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> Hey guys, assuming there are not objections from incubator, I'm doing
>>>>> what I can to try to get the bridge project ready so we can hit the
>>>>> ground running.  I was wondering what you guys thought about adding a
>>>>> couple of components to the jsr-301 jira project.
>>>>>
>>>>> First off, I would like to add impl and api components to this project.
>>>>> As an R.I., the api for this project will be largely dictated by the
>>>>> spec.  Therefore bugs filed against the API should be handled with more
>>>>> scrutiny then changes to impl need to be.
>>>>>
>>>>> Secondly, I would like to see a separate component for documentation
as
>>>>> I will expect there will be a lot added here.
>>>>>
>>>>> Third, it MIGHT be nice to add a "testing" component.  I know that
>>>>> testing tasks could be included in the api and impl components, but part
>>>>> of the requirements for the testing suite for this project should be
>>>>> able ensuring compliance with the TCK.  As an R.I., I know I personally
>>>>> would want to see these tests be as accurate as possible to ensure that
>>>>> the R.I. correctly implements the JSR-301 specification.
>>>>>
>>>>> What do you guys think?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>   Scott
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>       
>> --
>> http://www.irian.at
>> Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting,
>> Development and Courses in English and
>> German
>>
>> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>>
>>     
>
>
>   


Mime
View raw message