myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mario Ivankovits <ma...@ops.co.at>
Subject Re: Merging Shale into MyFaces
Date Mon, 22 Oct 2007 17:10:00 GMT
Ok, so what about having a 'myfaces dormant' project where each module gets added where it
seems there is no real maintainer.
This could be a place for abandoned sandbox stuff too.
I know, the word 'maintainer' is not well placed in the context of an apache community, but
in the end I think it would be fair to show to users that no one is really working on an project.


Mario

-----Original Message-----
From: "Grant Smith" <work.grant@gmail.com>
Date: Monday, Okt 22, 2007 6:02 pm
Subject: Re: Merging Shale into MyFaces
To: Reply-    "MyFaces Development" <dev@myfaces.apache.org>To: "MyFaces Development"
<dev@myfaces.apache.org>

Conceptually, I am in favor of a merge. I wouldn't wait for JSF 2.0 to do it, though. +1.
>
>
>On 10/22/07, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:At least, 1 year, that
is my guess.
>
>So, I agree w/ Kito here
>
>-M
>
>On 10/22/07, Kito D. Mann <kmann@virtua.com> wrote:
>> I don't think that's a good idea, since JSF 2.0 is a year or more away....
>>
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> Kito D. Mann - Author, JavaServer Faces in Action
>> http://www.virtua.com - JSF/Java EE consulting, training, and mentoring
>> http://www.JSFCentral.com - JavaServer Faces FAQ, news, and info
>>
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Bernhard Slominski [mailto:bernhard.slominski@zooplus.com]
>> > Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 8:41 AM
>> > To: 'dev@shale.apache.org'; MyFaces Development
>> > Subject: AW: Merging Shale into MyFaces
>> >
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I guess it makes sense, to make the merger a post JSF 2 project.
>> > So all features, which are included in JSF 2 (e.g Remoting) should not
>> > move,
>> > but just stay in Shale.
>> > Also let's see where templating and component development goes before
>> > making
>> > a decision about Clay.
>> > So Shale is then the JSF 1.X add-on framework, when it comes to JSF 2
>> > all
>> > Add-Ons move to MyFaces.
>> >
>> > Bernhard
>> >
>> > > -----Urspr√ľngliche Nachricht-----
>> > > Von: craigmcc@gmail.com [mailto:craigmcc@gmail.com]Im Auftrag
>> > > von Craig
>> > > McClanahan
>> > > Gesendet: Montag, 22. Oktober 2007 01:48
>> > > An: MyFaces Development; Shale Developers List
>> > > Betreff: Re: Merging Shale into MyFaces
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > > > >     * Remoting
>> > > > > Unsure, as most of this can be done with PPR too.
>> > > >
>> > > > +1 This is pretty useful and easy to use, and will affect JSF 2.0.
>> > >
>> > > A secondary benefit is near-zero config for resource access,
>&gt


Mime
View raw message