myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Martin Marinschek" <martin.marinsc...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [PORTAL] JSR-301 Portlet Bridge uploaded
Date Fri, 07 Sep 2007 18:33:14 GMT
Hi Scott,

via javascript - I just add it dynamically on the client. Works for
all major browsers just fine.

regards,

Martin

On 9/4/07, Scott O'Bryan <darkarena@gmail.com> wrote:
> How are you getting the stylesheet reference into the header now?
> JSR-168 does not have a means of doing this.
>
> Scott
>
> Martin Marinschek wrote:
> > Yes, sure - it's the same problem. I've added it via javascript to the
> > head, works as well. Just adding it somewhere in the content might
> > work, but is essentially invalid html.
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > On 8/31/07, Scott O'Bryan <darkarena@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> What I envisioned for Trinidad is namespacing the CSS file and loading
> >> it outside of the head.  Would something like that be a possibility for
> >> Tomohawk?  I mean I imagine any bridge would have this issue would it not?
> >>
> >> Scott
> >>
> >> Martin Marinschek wrote:
> >>
> >>> My guess is that Tomahawk won't run out of the box with this bridge -
> >>> problem: css-files needed by components won't be added to the head
> >>> properly.
> >>>
> >>> regards,
> >>>
> >>> Martin
> >>>
> >>> On 8/17/07, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> :-)
> >>>>
> >>>> Yes, but I guess there might be some more impls out there,
> >>>> like one that comes with the container ;-)
> >>>>
> >>>> So, yes only one that goes with 301 (like this one ;-) )
> >>>>
> >>>> -M
> >>>>
> >>>> On 8/17/07, Scott O'Bryan <darkarena@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Right.  But for 1.2 and higher JSF implementations, you would not
need
> >>>>> to use another bridge.  This one should be the only one you'd need.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Scott
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> yeah, sort of.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> there are currently (mainly for JSF 1.1) tons of "JSF-Bridges"
> >>>>>> -Apache MyFaces Core (not Tomahawk ;-) )
> >>>>>> -Apache Portals Bridges (they have that for old school struts
as well)
> >>>>>> -Suns RI has a module for JSF-Portlet integration
> >>>>>> -,,,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> so, this one "fixes" that.
> >>>>>> It's a standard
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> javax. .... and just an impl (that does what the papers want
(or tries ;-) ))
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -M
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 8/17/07, Alexander Wallace <aw@rwmotloc.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Ok.. but with this bridge and the right version of myfaces
you would
> >>>>>>> not need something like the tomahawk bridge any more...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> thanks a bunch!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Aug 17, 2007, at 10:54 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> there was no real tomahawk bridge.
> >>>>>>>> that stuff is part of myfaces 1.1 (the core impl)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> the difference here is that 301 specifies a way, how
a JSF 1.2
> >>>>>>>> application should work inside a portal.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> for jsf 1.1 there was "just" a note like "JSF 1.1 should
run in a
> >>>>>>>> portlet..." (very simplified statement)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> So, no not a replacement, "just" an IMPL of the java
SPEC ;-)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 8/17/07, Alexander Wallace <aw@rwmotloc.com>
wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Does this bridge replace Tomahawk bridge?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Aug 17, 2007, at 10:39 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Sounds good to me.  Should we open up a discussion
though on
> >>>>>>>>>> "where" this should be committed so that we
can hit the ground
> >>>>>>>>>> running once the paperwork is listed?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Scott
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On 8/17/07, Scott O'Bryan <darkarena@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hey everyone.  After tearing though
the bureaucracy much slower
> >>>>>>>>>>>> then I
> >>>>>>>>>>>> would have liked, I uploaded the code
to  MYFACES-1664 for the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> JSR-301
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Portlet Bridge.  This code should comply
with the latest public
> >>>>>>>>>>>> draft of
> >>>>>>>>>>>> the JSR-301 specification and, once
we figure out where to put
> >>>>>>>>>>>> this and
> >>>>>>>>>>>> get it made available in svn, I'd like
to see people get their
> >>>>>>>>>>>> hands on
> >>>>>>>>>>>> it and try it out.  It is going to change
some things (for the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> better I
> >>>>>>>>>>>> hope), but if there are any unresolvable
issues with it, my hope
> >>>>>>>>>>>> is that
> >>>>>>>>>>>> we can get those concerns voiced so
that we can incorporate them
> >>>>>>>>>>>> into
> >>>>>>>>>>>> the final draft.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> That said, what are our next steps?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> we have to wait with the commit, until that
the paperworks
> >>>>>>>>>>> (Schedule
> >>>>>>>>>>> B) is listed here:
> >>>>>>>>>>> http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> -M
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Scott
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> further stuff:
> >>>>>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> >>>>>>>> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Matthias Wessendorf
> >>>>
> >>>> further stuff:
> >>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> >>>> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>


-- 

http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces

Mime
View raw message