myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Matthias Wessendorf" <mat...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [PORTAL] Liscencing (was: [PORTAL] JSR-301 Portlet Bridge uploaded)
Date Fri, 17 Aug 2007 16:27:43 GMT
Hi,

yes pom as well.

and also files in:
-META-INF/services/
-META-INF/

@myfaces: a bug ....

On 8/17/07, Scott O'Bryan <darkarena@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey, it looks like I did the impl, just not the API.  I'm fixing that now.
>
> That said, does the liscence need to be in the POM files?  I didn't
> notice a liscence in the MyFaces 1.2 POM files...  I have no problems
> putting it in, certainly, but we may want to make the 1.2 branch of
> MyFaces compliant with this as well.
>
> Scott
>
> Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > Hey Scott,
> >
> > did a quick look.
> > POMs and API .java class have to contain the Apache 2.0 license as well.
> >
> > Greetings,
> > Matthias
> >
> > PS: build runs .... :-)
> >
> > On 8/17/07, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> there was no real tomahawk bridge.
> >> that stuff is part of myfaces 1.1 (the core impl)
> >>
> >> the difference here is that 301 specifies a way, how a JSF 1.2
> >> application should work inside a portal.
> >>
> >> for jsf 1.1 there was "just" a note like "JSF 1.1 should run in a
> >> portlet..." (very simplified statement)
> >>
> >> So, no not a replacement, "just" an IMPL of the java SPEC ;-)
> >>
> >> On 8/17/07, Alexander Wallace <aw@rwmotloc.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Does this bridge replace Tomahawk bridge?
> >>>
> >>> On Aug 17, 2007, at 10:39 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Sounds good to me.  Should we open up a discussion though on
> >>>> "where" this should be committed so that we can hit the ground
> >>>> running once the paperwork is listed?
> >>>>
> >>>> Scott
> >>>>
> >>>> Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 8/17/07, Scott O'Bryan <darkarena@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hey everyone.  After tearing though the bureaucracy much slower
> >>>>>> then I
> >>>>>> would have liked, I uploaded the code to  MYFACES-1664 for the
> >>>>>> JSR-301
> >>>>>> Portlet Bridge.  This code should comply with the latest public
> >>>>>> draft of
> >>>>>> the JSR-301 specification and, once we figure out where to put
> >>>>>> this and
> >>>>>> get it made available in svn, I'd like to see people get their
> >>>>>> hands on
> >>>>>> it and try it out.  It is going to change some things (for the
> >>>>>> better I
> >>>>>> hope), but if there are any unresolvable issues with it, my
hope
> >>>>>> is that
> >>>>>> we can get those concerns voiced so that we can incorporate
them
> >>>>>> into
> >>>>>> the final draft.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> That said, what are our next steps?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> we have to wait with the commit, until that the paperworks (Schedule
> >>>>> B) is listed here:
> >>>>> http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -M
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Scott
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >> --
> >> Matthias Wessendorf
> >>
> >> further stuff:
> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> >> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>


-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org

Mime
View raw message