myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Matthias Wessendorf" <mat...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [PORTAL] JSR-301 Portlet Bridge uploaded
Date Fri, 17 Aug 2007 16:05:49 GMT
yeah, sort of.

there are currently (mainly for JSF 1.1) tons of "JSF-Bridges"
-Apache MyFaces Core (not Tomahawk ;-) )
-Apache Portals Bridges (they have that for old school struts as well)
-Suns RI has a module for JSF-Portlet integration
-,,,

so, this one "fixes" that.
It's a standard

javax. .... and just an impl (that does what the papers want (or tries ;-) ))

-M

On 8/17/07, Alexander Wallace <aw@rwmotloc.com> wrote:
> Ok.. but with this bridge and the right version of myfaces you would
> not need something like the tomahawk bridge any more...
>
> thanks a bunch!
>
> On Aug 17, 2007, at 10:54 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>
> > there was no real tomahawk bridge.
> > that stuff is part of myfaces 1.1 (the core impl)
> >
> > the difference here is that 301 specifies a way, how a JSF 1.2
> > application should work inside a portal.
> >
> > for jsf 1.1 there was "just" a note like "JSF 1.1 should run in a
> > portlet..." (very simplified statement)
> >
> > So, no not a replacement, "just" an IMPL of the java SPEC ;-)
> >
> > On 8/17/07, Alexander Wallace <aw@rwmotloc.com> wrote:
> >> Does this bridge replace Tomahawk bridge?
> >>
> >> On Aug 17, 2007, at 10:39 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
> >>
> >>> Sounds good to me.  Should we open up a discussion though on
> >>> "where" this should be committed so that we can hit the ground
> >>> running once the paperwork is listed?
> >>>
> >>> Scott
> >>>
> >>> Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> >>>> On 8/17/07, Scott O'Bryan <darkarena@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hey everyone.  After tearing though the bureaucracy much slower
> >>>>> then I
> >>>>> would have liked, I uploaded the code to  MYFACES-1664 for the
> >>>>> JSR-301
> >>>>> Portlet Bridge.  This code should comply with the latest public
> >>>>> draft of
> >>>>> the JSR-301 specification and, once we figure out where to put
> >>>>> this and
> >>>>> get it made available in svn, I'd like to see people get their
> >>>>> hands on
> >>>>> it and try it out.  It is going to change some things (for the
> >>>>> better I
> >>>>> hope), but if there are any unresolvable issues with it, my hope
> >>>>> is that
> >>>>> we can get those concerns voiced so that we can incorporate them
> >>>>> into
> >>>>> the final draft.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> That said, what are our next steps?
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> we have to wait with the commit, until that the paperworks
> >>>> (Schedule
> >>>> B) is listed here:
> >>>> http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html
> >>>>
> >>>> -M
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Scott
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > further stuff:
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> >
>
>


-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org

Mime
View raw message