myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Martin Marinschek" <martin.marinsc...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [PORTAL] Liscencing
Date Sat, 01 Sep 2007 05:52:08 GMT
Someone who has commit rights to the incubator IP clearance page has
to commit it there - so Michael couldn't have done so, I suppose. Has
there be an Apache member taking this over?

regards,

Martin

On 8/31/07, Scott O'Bryan <darkarena@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yeah, supposedly.  The work for the IP Clearance form was submitted by
> the JSR-301 Project Lead on the 16th.  At least that's what I was told
> which is why he told me to go-ahead and submit it.  But I haven't seen
> it processed by Apache yet.
>
> Scott
>
> Martin Marinschek wrote:
> > Hi Matthias, Scott,
> >
> > has the IP Clearance form already been filled out and committed?
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > On 8/17/07, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> but all this, can be fixed, when it's already committed.
> >>
> >> We needed NOTICE and LICENSE files inside both JARs as well.
> >>
> >> -M
> >>
> >> On 8/17/07, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> yes pom as well.
> >>>
> >>> and also files in:
> >>> -META-INF/services/
> >>> -META-INF/
> >>>
> >>> @myfaces: a bug ....
> >>>
> >>> On 8/17/07, Scott O'Bryan <darkarena@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hey, it looks like I did the impl, just not the API.  I'm fixing that
now.
> >>>>
> >>>> That said, does the liscence need to be in the POM files?  I didn't
> >>>> notice a liscence in the MyFaces 1.2 POM files...  I have no problems
> >>>> putting it in, certainly, but we may want to make the 1.2 branch of
> >>>> MyFaces compliant with this as well.
> >>>>
> >>>> Scott
> >>>>
> >>>> Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hey Scott,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> did a quick look.
> >>>>> POMs and API .java class have to contain the Apache 2.0 license
as well.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Greetings,
> >>>>> Matthias
> >>>>>
> >>>>> PS: build runs .... :-)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 8/17/07, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> there was no real tomahawk bridge.
> >>>>>> that stuff is part of myfaces 1.1 (the core impl)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> the difference here is that 301 specifies a way, how a JSF 1.2
> >>>>>> application should work inside a portal.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> for jsf 1.1 there was "just" a note like "JSF 1.1 should run
in a
> >>>>>> portlet..." (very simplified statement)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> So, no not a replacement, "just" an IMPL of the java SPEC ;-)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 8/17/07, Alexander Wallace <aw@rwmotloc.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Does this bridge replace Tomahawk bridge?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Aug 17, 2007, at 10:39 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Sounds good to me.  Should we open up a discussion though
on
> >>>>>>>> "where" this should be committed so that we can hit
the ground
> >>>>>>>> running once the paperwork is listed?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Scott
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On 8/17/07, Scott O'Bryan <darkarena@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Hey everyone.  After tearing though the bureaucracy
much slower
> >>>>>>>>>> then I
> >>>>>>>>>> would have liked, I uploaded the code to  MYFACES-1664
for the
> >>>>>>>>>> JSR-301
> >>>>>>>>>> Portlet Bridge.  This code should comply with
the latest public
> >>>>>>>>>> draft of
> >>>>>>>>>> the JSR-301 specification and, once we figure
out where to put
> >>>>>>>>>> this and
> >>>>>>>>>> get it made available in svn, I'd like to see
people get their
> >>>>>>>>>> hands on
> >>>>>>>>>> it and try it out.  It is going to change some
things (for the
> >>>>>>>>>> better I
> >>>>>>>>>> hope), but if there are any unresolvable issues
with it, my hope
> >>>>>>>>>> is that
> >>>>>>>>>> we can get those concerns voiced so that we
can incorporate them
> >>>>>>>>>> into
> >>>>>>>>>> the final draft.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> That said, what are our next steps?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> we have to wait with the commit, until that the
paperworks (Schedule
> >>>>>>>>> B) is listed here:
> >>>>>>>>> http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> -M
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Scott
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> further stuff:
> >>>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> >>>>>> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>> --
> >>> Matthias Wessendorf
> >>>
> >>> further stuff:
> >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> >>> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> >>>
> >>>
> >> --
> >> Matthias Wessendorf
> >>
> >> further stuff:
> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> >> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>


-- 

http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces

Mime
View raw message