myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Scott O'Bryan <darkar...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [PORTAL] JSR-301 Portlet Bridge uploaded
Date Fri, 31 Aug 2007 19:40:57 GMT
What I envisioned for Trinidad is namespacing the CSS file and loading 
it outside of the head.  Would something like that be a possibility for 
Tomohawk?  I mean I imagine any bridge would have this issue would it not?

Scott

Martin Marinschek wrote:
> My guess is that Tomahawk won't run out of the box with this bridge -
> problem: css-files needed by components won't be added to the head
> properly.
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 8/17/07, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
>   
>> :-)
>>
>> Yes, but I guess there might be some more impls out there,
>> like one that comes with the container ;-)
>>
>> So, yes only one that goes with 301 (like this one ;-) )
>>
>> -M
>>
>> On 8/17/07, Scott O'Bryan <darkarena@gmail.com> wrote:
>>     
>>> Right.  But for 1.2 and higher JSF implementations, you would not need
>>> to use another bridge.  This one should be the only one you'd need.
>>>
>>> Scott
>>>
>>> Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>>>       
>>>> yeah, sort of.
>>>>
>>>> there are currently (mainly for JSF 1.1) tons of "JSF-Bridges"
>>>> -Apache MyFaces Core (not Tomahawk ;-) )
>>>> -Apache Portals Bridges (they have that for old school struts as well)
>>>> -Suns RI has a module for JSF-Portlet integration
>>>> -,,,
>>>>
>>>> so, this one "fixes" that.
>>>> It's a standard
>>>>
>>>> javax. .... and just an impl (that does what the papers want (or tries ;-)
))
>>>>
>>>> -M
>>>>
>>>> On 8/17/07, Alexander Wallace <aw@rwmotloc.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> Ok.. but with this bridge and the right version of myfaces you would
>>>>> not need something like the tomahawk bridge any more...
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks a bunch!
>>>>>
>>>>> On Aug 17, 2007, at 10:54 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>>>> there was no real tomahawk bridge.
>>>>>> that stuff is part of myfaces 1.1 (the core impl)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> the difference here is that 301 specifies a way, how a JSF 1.2
>>>>>> application should work inside a portal.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> for jsf 1.1 there was "just" a note like "JSF 1.1 should run in a
>>>>>> portlet..." (very simplified statement)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, no not a replacement, "just" an IMPL of the java SPEC ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 8/17/07, Alexander Wallace <aw@rwmotloc.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> Does this bridge replace Tomahawk bridge?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Aug 17, 2007, at 10:39 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>> Sounds good to me.  Should we open up a discussion though
on
>>>>>>>> "where" this should be committed so that we can hit the ground
>>>>>>>> running once the paperwork is listed?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Scott
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>>> On 8/17/07, Scott O'Bryan <darkarena@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>>>>>> Hey everyone.  After tearing though the bureaucracy
much slower
>>>>>>>>>> then I
>>>>>>>>>> would have liked, I uploaded the code to  MYFACES-1664
for the
>>>>>>>>>> JSR-301
>>>>>>>>>> Portlet Bridge.  This code should comply with the
latest public
>>>>>>>>>> draft of
>>>>>>>>>> the JSR-301 specification and, once we figure out
where to put
>>>>>>>>>> this and
>>>>>>>>>> get it made available in svn, I'd like to see people
get their
>>>>>>>>>> hands on
>>>>>>>>>> it and try it out.  It is going to change some things
(for the
>>>>>>>>>> better I
>>>>>>>>>> hope), but if there are any unresolvable issues with
it, my hope
>>>>>>>>>> is that
>>>>>>>>>> we can get those concerns voiced so that we can incorporate
them
>>>>>>>>>> into
>>>>>>>>>> the final draft.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That said, what are our next steps?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>                     
>>>>>>>>> we have to wait with the commit, until that the paperworks
>>>>>>>>> (Schedule
>>>>>>>>> B) is listed here:
>>>>>>>>> http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -M
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>>>>>> Scott
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>                     
>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>>>
>>>>>> further stuff:
>>>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>>>> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>       
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> further stuff:
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
>>
>>     
>
>
>   


Mime
View raw message