Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 33886 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2007 18:56:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Jul 2007 18:56:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 2379 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2007 16:59:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-dev-archive@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 2304 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2007 16:59:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@myfaces.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "MyFaces Development" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 2266 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jul 2007 16:59:54 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Jul 2007 09:59:54 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of mwessendorf@gmail.com designates 209.85.146.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.146.176] (HELO wa-out-1112.google.com) (209.85.146.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Jul 2007 09:59:49 -0700 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id l24so3706733waf for ; Thu, 05 Jul 2007 09:59:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=YCFfp+DjF3YNvJq6ojVS3OMttOymSxnVyEy6bg9ye3u+/mHOjB+bFwE2j0qxJts/+94GtC/NOMr/5rsz2J4Zy7N60O5aK4AD1BVbOpQT60l+7y5/BUCvDH2QYoXWBkjYR/kU8DbI8ozH5Ag9nZfMTRYQgjUmc5/H+zO0qNaPY8o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=E0AMOBt8cPTBP2fmRhIZooj8eBZba236hCOofAnqHxmUiGMdovnysrLX4NEtFJlZld7nvgSv/P4RuzePVUdCXSKN+vbw3wHuxcibkFQfzIZfCVhkP295As4DJiX4TvUpMuzXfo9MDukZq+AtCCDqB8NBmGrrHVfv1Me43FDmKCw= Received: by 10.114.81.1 with SMTP id e1mr8312412wab.1183654769102; Thu, 05 Jul 2007 09:59:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.54.18 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Jul 2007 09:59:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <71235db40707050959i98a2b78td9bb5c2548a341f1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 18:59:29 +0200 From: "Matthias Wessendorf" Sender: mwessendorf@gmail.com To: "MyFaces Development" Subject: Re: Changing Trinidad releases from 1.0.x to 1.1.x for JSF 1.1 spec In-Reply-To: <254acf980707050849w1dd18d79oca6ed7310737d171@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <254acf980707050849w1dd18d79oca6ed7310737d171@mail.gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: f546000842b587c1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +0 I don't care. We had enough emails on "right" versioning here in MyFaces. My energy on that topic is gone :-) -Matthias On 7/5/07, Simon Lessard wrote: > Hello all, > > What would you think of renaming the release of Trinidad so it align with > JSF spec version as we chose to do with MyFaces? I think it would make it > simpler for end users. > > > Regards, > > ~ Simon > -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org