myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Grant Smith" <work.gr...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] MyFaces 1.2.x become trunk
Date Mon, 23 Jul 2007 15:50:20 GMT
+1

On 7/23/07, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > /branches
> > /branches/1_1_6
> > /branches/1_2_1
> > /tags
> > /tags/1_1_2
> > /tags/1_1_3
> > /tags/1_1_4
> > /tags/1_1_5
> > /tags/1_2_0
> > /tags/1_2_1
> > /1_1_x          <--- the trunk for JSF 1.1 development
> > /1_2_x          <--- the trunk for JSF 1.2 development
>
> I like that "tomcat style".
>
> -M
>
> >
> > The great advantage: We can do this step by step without breaking
> > anything. All we need to do is point the externals in the "current"
> > project to the right trunk folder. We even can do the restructuring
> > first and point the externals to the corresponding "1_1_x" trunks and
> > in a second step switch "current" to the "1_2_x" trunks without a need
> > to restructure again.
> > "
> >
> > WDYT?
> >
> > --Manfred
> >
> >
> >
> > On 7/20/07, Paul Spencer <paul@mikon.com> wrote:
> > > I do not like the idea of "current (symlink to jsf1.2)".  To me JSF
> 1.1
> > > and 1.2 are two products and should be treated as such.
> > >
> > > Paul Spencer
> > >
> > > Andrew Robinson wrote:
> > > > Not to be too anal, but would:
> > > >
> > > > current (symlink to jsf1.2)
> > > > jsf1.1
> > > > jsf1.2
> > > >
> > > > Be a little more "tidy"?
> > > >
> > > > It should also consider the web site right? Right now, it only shows
> > > > the current/trunk branch. Perhaps the site should be versioned as
> > > > well. Example using tomahawk:
> > > >
> > > > myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk/current (symlink to 1.2)
> > > > myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk/1.2
> > > > myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk/1.1
> > > >
> > > > On 7/20/07, Cagatay Civici <cagatay.civici@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> > "Why not":  how many users are ready to make the jump to
> > > >> > JSF 1.2?  Many of our users, Tomahawk, Trinidad, Tobago, are
> > > >> > on JSP 2.0 or earlier.
> > > >>
> > > >> Yeah, but we're just making 1.2 the trunk, not forcing people to
> use 1.2.
> > > >>
> > > >> Again two active branches current11 and current12 sounds good to
> me,
> > > >> where
> > > >> current12 has the trunks
> > > >>
> > > >> Cagatay
> > > >>
> > > >> On 7/20/07, Matt Cooper <matt.faces@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> > +1 (non-binding)
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On 7/20/07, Adam Winer < awiner@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> > > "Why not":  how many users are ready to make the jump to
> > > >> > > JSF 1.2?  Many of our users, Tomahawk, Trinidad, Tobago,
are
> > > >> > > on JSP 2.0 or earlier.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > It'd make my life way easier if the Trinidad trunk were
1.2,
> > > >> > > definitely, I just doubt that would hold true for the users.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Just for starters, what about the committers?  How many
> > > >> > > of us can stick to 1.2?
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > -- Adam
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > On 7/20/07, Cagatay Civici < cagatay.civici@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > >> > > > About subprojects, I think the case is same for them,
if we
> make
> > > >> 1.2
> > > >> the
> > > >> > > > trunk for api, why not set 1.2 branches of subprojects
as
> trunks
> > > >> too?
> > > >> Also
> > > >> > > > after doing it, we may need to reconfigure current
and
> current12
> > > >> too.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > On 7/19/07, Paul Spencer <paulsp@apache.org>
wrote:
> > > >> > > > > Assuming MyFaces 1.1.7 is released so the SVN
configuration
> in
> > > >> the
> > > >> POM
> > > >> > > > > of next version of MyFaces will be correct.  Otherwise
> people,
> > > >> including
> > > >> > > > > Continuum, who are using 1.1.7-SNAPSHOT from the
repository
> > > >> will be
> > > >> in
> > > >> > > > > for a very big surprise.
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > Qualified +1 otherwise -0 for the above reason
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > Although I missed the discussion, my preference
would be
> for a
> > > >> MyFaces
> > > >> > > > > 1.1 and 1.2 trunk/branch since both are active
products.
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > Paul Spencer
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > Hi,
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > this is a vote for making the JSF 1.2 efforts
by our
> group to
> > > >> become
> > > >> > > > > > the current trunk.
> > > >> > > > > > Currently the JSF 1.2-work lives on a branch
(
> > > >> 1.2.1-SNAPSHOT is
> > > >> the
> > > >> > > > > > current version).
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > Please cast your vote
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > ------------------------------------------------
> > > >> > > > > > [ ] +1 for moving the myfaces 1.2.x to trunk
> > > >> > > > > > [ ] +0
> > > >> > > > > > [ ] -1 and why..............
> > > >> > > > > > ------------------------------------------------
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > -M
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > http://www.irian.at
> > Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting,
> > Development and Courses in English and
> > German
> >
> > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> >
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
>



-- 
Grant Smith

Mime
View raw message