Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-23128-apmail-myfaces-dev-archive=myfaces.apache.org@myfaces.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 67409 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2007 22:33:18 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jun 2007 22:33:18 -0000
Received: (qmail 60929 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2007 22:33:20 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-dev-archive@myfaces.apache.org
Received: (qmail 60880 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2007 22:33:20 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@myfaces.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@myfaces.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@myfaces.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@myfaces.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.myfaces.apache.org>
Reply-To: "MyFaces Development" <dev@myfaces.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@myfaces.apache.org
Received: (qmail 60869 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2007 22:33:20 -0000
Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 15:33:20 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of awiner@gmail.com designates
 209.85.146.178 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.146.178] (HELO wa-out-1112.google.com) (209.85.146.178)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 15:33:15 -0700
Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id j4so904775wah
        for <dev@myfaces.apache.org>; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 15:32:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=HGd2P9/J1g5psxX+GY900y6gmVjxPZfM/jegbJh49QYkPfjcav34LCWRt+82uOAuZFK5of0WuSUYWJscH8IUap2o/vyiONUxDXF9y5M2zB9dUvF+y8nNOvjKmCBS3Z1m1/4tmamEje2pwyMRy+Q5KcTWgJE1jCVphsAAV1TRixs=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=e6huVuYANuTyppanqY+iYO+mL0ZUcXlfOoKWBpFMYK1ISEAuP9kH9tBxPr+SpLh1BcEa9J6bQGSm5DeMq9hSloEqvG+UEgkEPXhOGIGTCI9S4rigbLfwjIZWnmAAZJ+LIfgNAgN5AcApyfXKU7NTWnmXg3/8npOxYzhJicSGR0I=
Received: by 10.114.184.16 with SMTP id h16mr2316785waf.1180737175470;
        Fri, 01 Jun 2007 15:32:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.115.18.12 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Jun 2007 15:32:55 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <6dac79b90706011532r5b060af0s719c1d159ee0020d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 15:32:55 -0700
From: "Adam Winer" <awiner@gmail.com>
To: "MyFaces Development" <dev@myfaces.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Heads up - backwards compatibility found between 1.1 and 1.2
In-Reply-To: <5a99335f0706010952p6b7f057cje8805405722064bc@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <10916460.post@talk.nabble.com>
	 <5a99335f0706010952p6b7f057cje8805405722064bc@mail.gmail.com>
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

I don't think it is in this patch.  But for my taste, the
fix here is far uglier than this minor bug.  Adding a
package-private method to UIComponentClassicTagBase
and using Method.setAccessible(true)... <shudder>!  Do we
even know that container security permissions will uniformly
allow this?

-- Adam


On 6/1/07, Martin Marinschek <martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> So you've finally decided to make loadBundle be a component. That's
> good, that will help. Is it active in all lifecycle phases then?
>
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 6/1/07, rlubke <Ryan.Lubke@sun.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > Just a heads up that a new backwards compatibility issue was found between
> > 1.1 and 1.2.
> >
> > The details can be found here:
> > https://javaserverfaces.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=577
> >
> > I'm guessing MyFaces will have the same issue if the attached reproduced
> > application is
> > run.  If not, well, just ignore this ;)
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Heads-up---backwards-compatibility-found-between-1.1-and-1.2-tf3853363.html#a10916460
> > Sent from the My Faces - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>