Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 74799 invoked from network); 17 May 2007 19:16:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 May 2007 19:16:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 48450 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2007 19:16:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-dev-archive@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 48427 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2007 19:16:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@myfaces.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "MyFaces Development" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 48392 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2007 19:16:40 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 May 2007 12:16:40 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of manfred.geiler@gmail.com designates 64.233.184.238 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.184.238] (HELO wr-out-0506.google.com) (64.233.184.238) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 May 2007 12:16:33 -0700 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i23so691683wra for ; Thu, 17 May 2007 12:16:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=kEIJeylrk2RwbfZTxhDMVq1LcwoJFRSl+IRQlzBrSGwlbb1ckA/+7mm0ac1aQ60FElHXlLTTLX/xjudh6ZoHIcXfu95sghQb9qhQ5Ql3OehW4QUWa/32T725M6laBFarXj6veFwIhBGgTCW9gbTNe8MT1d9TWp1HJUPE+M2q0HA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=UdTxxpSu/t/zYTQEAebn87mtBJRtJNQJnGZz+2OHwm4ZT+jrOMsnwERZrgJ7vNT2Dhns0Slb/6PNoC/yZES+/Y0y69fIkLERtHNPwHc9xe37hjPw7hYaDDhlyXtM2jFD5QNYFYwUTXTYCa3wkoAwIB4uGepjHMFr8CFGNTcBDYI= Received: by 10.114.36.1 with SMTP id j1mr398226waj.1179429371592; Thu, 17 May 2007 12:16:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.150.8 with HTTP; Thu, 17 May 2007 12:16:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <564d4f680705171216h2b57cb6bm481fe9f4c381e94d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 21:16:11 +0200 From: "Manfred Geiler" To: "MyFaces Development" Subject: Re: Eventual release of MyFaces 1.2 In-Reply-To: <8f985b960705161148v45338b60xe8d324441dad0517@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1a681ff20705161134i38958b0bpda5e2082faa931c1@mail.gmail.com> <8f985b960705161148v45338b60xe8d324441dad0517@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Yes, and the good news is: We just got a notification from Geir that everything is fine and we are already allowed to officially release the 1.2 impl. Since I'm on vacation now I will not be able to do the release work before Monday. But I will try everything possible and impossible to get a release out at the end of next week. --Manfred On 5/16/07, Mike Kienenberger wrote: > The version number is our software version number. The code is our > code. We can do whatever we like so long as we meet ASF legal > requirements and provided we don't claim any particular certification. > > On 5/16/07, Bruno Aranda wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Now that we have a usable implementation of MyFaces 1.2 (not official > > yet) we could start thinking on doing a release. Can we legally have a > > release called MyFaces 1.2 even if we don't have the acknowledgement > > from Sun that it is conformant to the TCK? Otherwise we can always > > release a MyFaces 1.2 beta or milestone whatever. > > Anyway, to release MyFaces 1.2 we need to release first Trinidad's > > maven-faces-plugin 1.2. Could we think then too on releasing the > > Trinidad artifacts, or at least, this one? > > At the same time and coinciding with this release, I would adopt > > Manfred's idea of having the two "trunks" as the tomcat guys do, one > > for myfaces 1.1 and the other for myfaces 1.2. > > > > Thoughts? Any limitation, legal or functional, that we must deal with > > before releasing MyFaces 1.2-whatever? > > > > Cheers, > > > > Bruno > > > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces