myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Adam Winer" <awi...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Trinidad] non-"sandbox" commits should have JIRA issues
Date Sat, 12 May 2007 18:41:12 GMT
OK, great!  Let me know if (or, rather, *when*) I slip again. :)

-- Adam


On 5/12/07, Mike Kienenberger <mkienenb@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, my original message said "non-trivial, non-sandbox", but when I
> typed it in again, I didn't include it.   Sorry for the confusion.
>
> On 5/12/07, Adam Winer <awiner@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I completely agree for anything non-trivial, but
> > what about comparative trivia like:
> >   - whitespace changes
> >   - deleting unused variables
> >   - fixing spelling errors
> >   - etc..
> >
> > There's no value to mentioning these in release notes,
> > and if you have a thorough SVN commit message
> > (which should always be required practice), no one
> > will wonder why it was done...  Just looking for
> > the happy medium.  If you put too much procedure
> > on checkins, then people will:
> >   - Merge two tasks into one checkin (very bad procedure)
> >   - Not even bother with simple stuff
> >
> > All that said, I absolutely should have referred
> > some checkins last week to
> > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ADFFACES-135
> > Mea culpa!
> >
> > -- Adam
> >
> >
> > On 5/10/07, Mike Kienenberger <mkienenb@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Just an FYI that the standard MyFaces practice is that all non-sandbox
> > > commits should have JIRA issues (and references in the commit log).
> > >
> > > This makes it easier to create release notes as well as to research
> > > why a change was made.
> > >
> >
>

Mime
View raw message