Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 52329 invoked from network); 18 Apr 2007 15:49:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Apr 2007 15:49:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 41952 invoked by uid 500); 18 Apr 2007 15:49:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-dev-archive@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 41741 invoked by uid 500); 18 Apr 2007 15:49:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@myfaces.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "MyFaces Development" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 41730 invoked by uid 99); 18 Apr 2007 15:49:35 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 08:49:35 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of mkienenb@gmail.com designates 64.233.162.227 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.162.227] (HELO nz-out-0506.google.com) (64.233.162.227) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 08:49:27 -0700 Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id n29so92153nzf for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 08:49:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=HFUazGnbicq7cwpQ83ISL/3sKbs1ByW+/FID2pSvTBQccgeTTdQ4yRm+d32/p5mbo6RMRG2yMYECk8Cra4985juiP9SYHNX6eOQOX8wZ/qwcsZUuNK+kyxhueifBecSw6JB2s08cRi2PCSQXwkmT0Om2cV5cfSP6bntyAxbKi7M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=fXArYlIlNDu1B4R3KT2Ik1NbMLjl+HRXMIdid5/il5tBnCH8WgAAIe8FzuUZd7NwrUAwCBg8et92v8abjLKU6WaqX1TiAXITfhJjR3C16leypEbZV503ctIeFDTGbE6B899/W1ZwXBWoZXKzFHCeoe9/KgDclrxsXT2HU7C4mno= Received: by 10.114.61.1 with SMTP id j1mr293017waa.1176911346471; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 08:49:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.200.8 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 08:49:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8f985b960704180849p5cd34cf1r3633ab245a5309b4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 11:49:06 -0400 From: "Mike Kienenberger" To: "MyFaces Development" Subject: Re: Use 1.2 as current now In-Reply-To: <5a99335f0704180106h45a5fa16k90cca8ed2e816940@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <5a99335f0704180106h45a5fa16k90cca8ed2e816940@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Will there be a clear process in place for those who are not using 1.2 yet to check and out and fix 1.1 issues? There's 80+ issues still open. My initial reaction was -1, but I'm tending more toward +1 now, so long as 1.1 development can continue fairly easily. I'm hoping to be able to switch to Java 1.5 in a month or two, but that's not yet an option. On 4/18/07, Martin Marinschek wrote: > Hi *, > > I wonder if we should switch the trunk to be the 1.2 branch now, cause > our next release will surely be fully 1.2 compatible (Tomcat 6 is out > now, so the sooner we're done, the better)... We'll have a lot better > testing of 1.2 if we do it like this - wdyt? > > regards, > > Martin > > -- > > http://www.irian.at > > Your JSF powerhouse - > JSF Consulting, Development and > Courses in English and German > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >