Mailing-List: contact dev-help@myfaces.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "MyFaces Development" <dev@myfaces.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of mkienenb@gmail.com designates
 209.85.132.243 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=Hj8QxS7gjoW65IdWp1W7BHH4aoC38aUHGGf7rP/5IdUoPRoeMfxs8FXD+AHu3qNN6AV61PpAEM91ewKvlhfhGXUd0n74iGsKMUgbS22OZYGZTA2S8VMZJCiACZns3vqv92DFHOZQVjiaVZU8Kn1tFaSBFIk6uM+nYFGE+fxKgi4=
Message-ID: <8f985b960702221113p57b1262cpbfba28b6e2c484ab@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:13:02 -0500
From: "Mike Kienenberger" <mkienenb@gmail.com>
To: "MyFaces Development" <dev@myfaces.apache.org>
Subject: Re: MyFaces Fusion
In-Reply-To: <erkoub$qhj$2@sea.gmane.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <45DDDF62.5070808@ops.co.at>
	 <8f985b960702221031t87c2983y85c4ef6f4d07fef5@mail.gmail.com>
	 <45DDE309.4020300@ops.co.at>
	 <5a99335f0702221052h12f021b9j8593f00e6e911b36@mail.gmail.com>
	 <erkoub$qhj$2@sea.gmane.org>

I went back and reread the "spring conversation scope and ejb".
There's nothing in here stating that Mario was planning on starting a
subproject or committing any code, so I don't think we're being too
harsh when someone starts a new subproject without any warning, and we
get concerned.

There needs to be some kind of discussion before a commit of this
type, even if it's a single message.

On 2/22/07, Werner Punz <werner.punz@gmail.com> wrote:
> Martin Marinschek schrieb:
> > Don't hit to hard on Mario - he tried to start a discussion on this
> > list, but there was no response (it was not about the name fusion, but
> > about the technical details of the spring-conversation stuff).
> > Sometimes there needs to be a commit in open source, so that the
> > discussion can start.
> >
> > And I believe this discussion can definitely start now...
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> I agree here, I can remember the post,
> anyway, fusion will be a great addition,
> mario has pushed some stuff in it which is pure genious
> and makes life of all of us easier in the long run.
>
> (Since I am at the starting points of a project
> I am eager to test the spring conversation context
> in combination with jpa)
>
>