myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Matthias Wessendorf" <mat...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Tomahawk 1.1.5 release plans?
Date Fri, 23 Feb 2007 15:03:09 GMT
> +1 on Dennis' suggestion (JSF 1.1 -> MyFaces 1.x, JSF 1.2 -> MyFaces 2.x)

dennis said:
1.1 -> 1.1.x,
1.2 -> 1.2.x

I think

1.1 -> 1.x.y
1.2 -> 2.x.y

is the better one...



>
> --Manfred
>
>
>
> On 2/23/07, Martin Marinschek <martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Dennis,
> >
> > the problem is that you don't have any leeway to change the
> > MyFaces-API (read: not JSF API) incompatible to what it had been
> > before. Well, given we finally reach the point at which we have a
> > pretty stable API between bugfix-releases.
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > On 2/23/07, Dennis Byrne <dennis@dbyrne.net> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > >    JSF 1.1 -> MyFaces 1.x
> > > >    JSF 1.2 -> MyFaces 2.x
> > >
> > > I'd rather keep the release numbers in sync with the spec numbers.
> > >
> > > 1.1 -> 1.1.x,
> > > 1.2 -> 1.2.x
> > >
> > > > Paul Spencer
> > > >
> > > > Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > > > > we sould do the same for core
> > > > >
> > > > > next is 1.5.0
> > > > >
> > > > > and JSF 1.2 stuff should be changed to 2.0.0
> > > > >
> > > > > On 2/23/07, Manfred Geiler <manfred.geiler@gmail.com > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> 1.5.0 or 1.6.0. One is as good as the other IMO.
> > > > >> You mean 1.6.0 is better because it does not "match" the 1.1.5
of
> > > > >> current core?
> > > > >> I think Martin suggested 1.5.0 because it would be in the style
of
> > > > >> Tomcat 5.0.x vs Tomcat 5.5.x, right?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --Manfred
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On 2/23/07, Paul Spencer < paulsp@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > >> > If the version of Tomahawk is not tied to the version of
MyFaces,
> > > then
> > > > >> > how about the NEXT version of Tomahawk be 1.6?
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > This would allow Tomahawk, like Tobago, to be version independently
> > > > >> of MyFaces.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Paul Spencer
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Martin Marinschek wrote:
> > > > >> > > slightly too late, but 1.1.5 would have been my option
as well.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > other option: 1.5 - and let tomahawk and impl version
numbers get
> > > > >> out of
> > > > >> > > sync.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > regards,
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Martin
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > On 2/23/07, Manfred Geiler <manfred.geiler@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >> Ok, thanks for your feedback.
> > > > >> > >> Branch 1.1.5 created.
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >> --Manfred
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >> On 2/23/07, Wendy Smoak < wsmoak@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > > >> > >> > On 2/23/07, Manfred Geiler <manfred.geiler@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > > >> > >> > > The new tomahawk release number is a
trade-off.
> > > > >> > >> > > We must decide between
> > > > >> > >> > >  - releasing tomahawk 1.1.4 which is
not compatible to core
> > > > >> 1.1.4 and
> > > > >> > >> > > therefore might confuse users
> > > > >> > >> > >  - skipping tomahawk 1.1.4, stay in sync
with core and have a
> > > > >> > >> tomahawk
> > > > >> > >> > > 1.1.5 that is 100% compatible to the
current core 1.1.5
> > > > >> > >> >
> > > > >> > >> > +1 for Tomahawk 1.1.5 this time around, which
will be
> > > > >> compatible with
> > > > >> > >> > Core 1.1.5.
> > > > >> > >> >
> > > > >> > >> > (There is plenty of information in the archives
if anyone asks
> > > > >> "what
> > > > >> > >> > happened" to 1.1.4.  As Paul points out, Tomcat
skips version
> > > > >> numbers
> > > > >> > >> > in their public release series.)
> > > > >> > >> >
> > > > >> > >> > --
> > > > >> > >> > Wendy
> > > > >> > >> >
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Dennis Byrne
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > http://www.irian.at
> >
> > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > Courses in English and German
> >
> > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> >
>


-- 
Matthias Wessendorf
http://tinyurl.com/fmywh

further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com

Mime
View raw message