myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Matthias Wessendorf" <mat...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Tomahawk 1.1.5 release plans?
Date Fri, 23 Feb 2007 14:19:38 GMT
we sould do the same for core

next is 1.5.0

and JSF 1.2 stuff should be changed to 2.0.0

On 2/23/07, Manfred Geiler <manfred.geiler@gmail.com> wrote:
> 1.5.0 or 1.6.0. One is as good as the other IMO.
> You mean 1.6.0 is better because it does not "match" the 1.1.5 of current core?
> I think Martin suggested 1.5.0 because it would be in the style of
> Tomcat 5.0.x vs Tomcat 5.5.x, right?
>
> --Manfred
>
>
> On 2/23/07, Paul Spencer <paulsp@apache.org> wrote:
> > If the version of Tomahawk is not tied to the version of MyFaces, then
> > how about the NEXT version of Tomahawk be 1.6?
> >
> > This would allow Tomahawk, like Tobago, to be version independently of MyFaces.
> >
> > Paul Spencer
> >
> > Martin Marinschek wrote:
> > > slightly too late, but 1.1.5 would have been my option as well.
> > >
> > > other option: 1.5 - and let tomahawk and impl version numbers get out of
> > > sync.
> > >
> > > regards,
> > >
> > > Martin
> > >
> > > On 2/23/07, Manfred Geiler <manfred.geiler@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Ok, thanks for your feedback.
> > >> Branch 1.1.5 created.
> > >>
> > >> --Manfred
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 2/23/07, Wendy Smoak <wsmoak@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> > On 2/23/07, Manfred Geiler <manfred.geiler@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> > > The new tomahawk release number is a trade-off.
> > >> > > We must decide between
> > >> > >  - releasing tomahawk 1.1.4 which is not compatible to core 1.1.4
and
> > >> > > therefore might confuse users
> > >> > >  - skipping tomahawk 1.1.4, stay in sync with core and have a
> > >> tomahawk
> > >> > > 1.1.5 that is 100% compatible to the current core 1.1.5
> > >> >
> > >> > +1 for Tomahawk 1.1.5 this time around, which will be compatible with
> > >> > Core 1.1.5.
> > >> >
> > >> > (There is plenty of information in the archives if anyone asks "what
> > >> > happened" to 1.1.4.  As Paul points out, Tomcat skips version numbers
> > >> > in their public release series.)
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > Wendy
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>


-- 
Matthias Wessendorf
http://tinyurl.com/fmywh

further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com

Mime
View raw message