myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Paul Spencer <pau...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Tomahawk 1.1.5 release plans?
Date Fri, 23 Feb 2007 14:49:16 GMT
How about

JSF 1.1 -> MyFaces 1.1.x
JSF 1.2 -> MyFaces 1.2.x

Tomahawk for JSF 1.1 -> Tomahawk 1.x
Tomahawk for JSF 1.2 -> Tomahawk 2.x

<sub project> for JSF 1.1 -> <sub project> 1.x
<sub project> for JSF 1.2 -> <sub project> 2.x

Paul Spencer



Dennis Byrne wrote:
>>    JSF 1.1 -> MyFaces 1.x
>>    JSF 1.2 -> MyFaces 2.x
> 
> 
> 
> I'd rather keep the release numbers in sync with the spec numbers.
> 
> 1.1 -> 1.1.x,
> 1.2 -> 1.2.x
> 
> Paul Spencer
> 
>>
>> Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>> > we sould do the same for core
>> >
>> > next is 1.5.0
>> >
>> > and JSF 1.2 stuff should be changed to 2.0.0
>> >
>> > On 2/23/07, Manfred Geiler <manfred.geiler@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> 1.5.0 or 1.6.0. One is as good as the other IMO.
>> >> You mean 1.6.0 is better because it does not "match" the 1.1.5 of
>> >> current core?
>> >> I think Martin suggested 1.5.0 because it would be in the style of
>> >> Tomcat 5.0.x vs Tomcat 5.5.x, right?
>> >>
>> >> --Manfred
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 2/23/07, Paul Spencer <paulsp@apache.org> wrote:
>> >> > If the version of Tomahawk is not tied to the version of MyFaces,
>> then
>> >> > how about the NEXT version of Tomahawk be 1.6?
>> >> >
>> >> > This would allow Tomahawk, like Tobago, to be version independently
>> >> of MyFaces.
>> >> >
>> >> > Paul Spencer
>> >> >
>> >> > Martin Marinschek wrote:
>> >> > > slightly too late, but 1.1.5 would have been my option as well.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > other option: 1.5 - and let tomahawk and impl version numbers
get
>> >> out of
>> >> > > sync.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > regards,
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Martin
>> >> > >
>> >> > > On 2/23/07, Manfred Geiler <manfred.geiler@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > >> Ok, thanks for your feedback.
>> >> > >> Branch 1.1.5 created.
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> --Manfred
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> On 2/23/07, Wendy Smoak <wsmoak@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > >> > On 2/23/07, Manfred Geiler <manfred.geiler@gmail.com>
wrote:
>> >> > >> > > The new tomahawk release number is a trade-off.
>> >> > >> > > We must decide between
>> >> > >> > >  - releasing tomahawk 1.1.4 which is not compatible
to core
>> >> 1.1.4 and
>> >> > >> > > therefore might confuse users
>> >> > >> > >  - skipping tomahawk 1.1.4, stay in sync with core
and have a
>> >> > >> tomahawk
>> >> > >> > > 1.1.5 that is 100% compatible to the current core
1.1.5
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> > +1 for Tomahawk 1.1.5 this time around, which will be
>> >> compatible with
>> >> > >> > Core 1.1.5.
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> > (There is plenty of information in the archives if anyone
asks
>> >> "what
>> >> > >> > happened" to 1.1.4.  As Paul points out, Tomcat skips
version
>> >> numbers
>> >> > >> > in their public release series.)
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> > --
>> >> > >> > Wendy
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.18.3/698 - Release Date: 2/23/2007 4:39 AM


Mime
View raw message