myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bernd Bohmann <bernd.bohm...@atanion.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tobago 1.0.8
Date Thu, 14 Sep 2006 07:46:57 GMT
Hello Mike,

the examples are 1.5 only. A JDK 1.4 version would be produce a very big 
pom. The retrotranslated version of Tobago is new in this release.

If I get more feedback from the community may be I will setup JDK 1.4 
examples.

Regards


Bernd



Mike Kienenberger wrote:
> Is this intended to be a Java 1.5-only release for examples?
> 
> I get this error when trying to run the examples under java 1.4.2.
> 
> java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError:
> org/apache/myfaces/tobago/webapp/TobagoServletContextListener
> (Unsupported major.minor version 49.0)
> 
> 
> On 9/13/06, Bernd Bohmann <bernd.bohmann@atanion.com> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> you can download the tobago examples from
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/builds/myfaces/nightly/myfaces-tobago-example-1.0.8-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz

>>
>>
>> the 1.0.8-SNAPSHOT is the next release
>>
>> Mike Kienenberger wrote:
>> > See this thread:
>> >
>> > 
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/myfaces-users/200604.mbox/%3c8f985b960604240732mcf024a7re36bac58cc755709@mail.gmail.com%3e

>>
>> >
>> >
>> > On 9/13/06, L Frohman <lfrohman@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> I was wondering the same thing, why isn't Tobago being "merged" into
>> >> Tomahawk?
>> >>
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Mike Kienenberger [mailto:mkienenb@gmail.com]
>> >> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 8:34 AM
>> >> To: MyFaces Development
>> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tobago 1.0.8
>> >>
>> >> On 9/13/06, Craig McClanahan <craigmcc@apache.org> wrote:
>> >> > FWIW, this is the kind of thing that motivates "a MyFaces 
>> committer is
>> >> > a MyFaces committer", as opposed to trying to segregate folks only
>> >> > interested in Tobago.  On the other hand, the fact that only a small
>> >> > number of folks in the MyFaces committer community seem 
>> interested in
>> >> > Tobago is a danger signal.
>> >>
>> >> I wasn't around with Tobago joined up, but my experience so far is
>> >> that it's
>> >> almost impossible to be both a Tobago and a Tomahawk user/developer.
>> >>
>> >> I can't speak for anyone else, but I don't have time to work with two
>> >> incompatible frameworks.
>> >>
>> >> I tried to start a dialog a while back on merging Tobago and Tomahawk
>> >> (or at
>> >> least making them more compatible) but nothing really came of it.
>> >>
>> >> If Tobago and Tomahawk aren't going to be made compatible with each
>> >> other, I
>> >> think perhaps that Tobago should become its own top-level project.
>> >>
>> >> Yes, there are some parts that overlap (like the proposed commons 
>> jar for
>> >> non-rendering code), but not enough that I feel qualified as a PMC
>> >> member to
>> >> vote on a Tobago release.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
> 

Mime
View raw message