Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 16759 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2006 17:26:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Aug 2006 17:26:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 57758 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2006 17:26:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-dev-archive@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 57716 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2006 17:26:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@myfaces.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "MyFaces Development" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@myfaces.apache.org Received: (qmail 57704 invoked by uid 99); 17 Aug 2006 17:26:56 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Aug 2006 10:26:56 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of mwessendorf@gmail.com designates 66.249.92.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.92.175] (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Aug 2006 10:26:55 -0700 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id u40so601154ugc for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2006 10:26:34 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=MfgW9AgJ+e+FvlzsPvJaskF5FyJD7yrORMsAbVAtIJ3Ae+Ifz9rq4Q4UWZx01Qkey9YukyyyaLaeXeVXXfyaFjFUIEBI4W2sv3IuVvnBUPEAI5dIfC3HaaLIy0z404exaMWHr6ffCmuGDF2pXw5smEp2YjVG/7h9a+zQC7MBl0g= Received: by 10.66.216.20 with SMTP id o20mr1302026ugg; Thu, 17 Aug 2006 10:26:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.240.9 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Aug 2006 10:26:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <71235db40608171026i7501f597j97611f0b9d25742b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 10:26:34 -0700 From: "Matthias Wessendorf" Sender: mwessendorf@gmail.com To: "MyFaces Development" Subject: Re: Proposal: Mark fixed issues as resolved instead of closed -- close all resolved issues on release In-Reply-To: <8f985b960608170900k346d901evc44948a8d2a6b56c@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <8f985b960608170900k346d901evc44948a8d2a6b56c@mail.gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 8ece63b8fca8b7d2 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N sounds reasonalbe. On 8/17/06, Mike Kienenberger wrote: > Now that JIRA supports bulk operations, I'd like to propose that we > use the resolve status to identify things that are fixed, but not yet > available in a release. As part of the release process, we would > change all resolved issues for a snapshot to closed after the release > is made. > -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com