myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Martin Marinschek" <martin.marinsc...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: s:secure
Date Wed, 16 Aug 2006 21:01:29 GMT
Hmm, but we suggested to build it as a map-bean to be able to pass
parameters. So what would be the positive aspect of using a resolver
with regard to parameters?

regards,

Martin

On 8/16/06, Mike Kienenberger <mkienenb@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm not doing the work, but if it were me, I'd try to do it as a
> resolver first due to the increased flexibility to pass method
> parameters.
>
> I wouldn't think it'd be any harder to extend or configure a resolver
> if it were designed properly.
>
> However, it's easier to pass the security bean around, and use it
> programmically.
>
> But either one is acceptable to me.
>
> On 8/16/06, Cagatay Civici <cagatay.civici@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > > There's no new functionality here, and it's not reducing any effort in
> > > my opinion.   This assumes that we go forward and created a resolver
> > > or a bean.  A resolver or a bean makes perfect sense, but a component
> > > doesn't.
> > >
> >
> > So we say goodbye to s:secure :)
> >
> > Ok a bean is a lot more simpler to implement than a resolver for sure, also
> > I'd not favor adding a new resolver to the resolver chain.
> >
> > So +1 for the bean, extending and maintaining the bean is also simpler.
> >
> > I'm planning to open a jira issue and assign it to myself after we all agree
> > on the choice.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Cagatay
> >
> >
> >  On 8/16/06, Mike Kienenberger <mkienenb@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 8/16/06, Martin Marinschek <martin.marinschek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > You're being polemic, Mike ;)
> > >
> > > You're not the first person who's told me that :-)
> > >
> > > > P.S.: What do we go for now? A bean or a resolver? What about
> > > > extending the thing - it would be easier with a bean, right?
> > >
> > > Dunno.   Not sure of the details of how a resolver is implemented, but
> > > it seems like it could be configured as easily as anything else.   A
> > > resolver will allow you to get around the method parameter
> > > limitations.
> > >
> >
> >
>


-- 

http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces

Mime
View raw message