myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Adam Winer" <>
Subject Re: Re: Client Validation Design Discussion
Date Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:04:59 GMT

As discussed earlier in this thread, I should be able to take
a validator someone else wrote and add Tomahawk validation
without subclassing ValidatorBase.

Adding the interface is far more flexible;  there's no reason
not to do it.

-- Adam

On 7/13/06, Mike Kienenberger <> wrote:
> One thing I'd like to point out -- all of the validators in MyFaces
> Tomahawk are intended to be subclassing ValidatorBase.   Otherwise,
> they're not going to pick up the common validator functionality that
> we're putting in there.   I'm not really certain why having an
> interface adds any value if this process is followed, but it's
> possible I've overlooked something.

View raw message