myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dennis Byrne" <den...@dbyrne.net>
Subject Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release
Date Wed, 07 Jun 2006 19:18:07 GMT
Sorry Sean, I still get this ...

Servlet.service() for servlet jsp threw exception
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Component _idJsp0 must be embedded in an form at org.apache.myfaces.shared_impl.renderkit.html.HtmlLinkRendererBase.renderJavaScriptAnchorStart

>From http://people.apache.org/builds/myfaces/nightly/ .

Dennis Byrne

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Sean Schofield [mailto:sean.schofield@gmail.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, June 7, 2006 12:55 PM
>To: 'MyFaces Development'
>Subject: Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release
>
>It seems I forgot to "clean" before assembling (I did clean before
>install though.)  So the old class files are there.  I'm uploading the
>new version now.  Can you try again?
>
>Sean
>
>On 6/7/06, Dennis Byrne <dennis@dbyrne.net> wrote:
>> Hello Sean,
>>
>> Thanks for getting this in the right branch, but I cannot see it when downloading
the latest .
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/builds/myfaces/nightly/
>>
>> Dennis Byrne
>>
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From: Sean Schofield [mailto:sean.schofield@gmail.com]
>> >Sent: Wednesday, June 7, 2006 08:04 AM
>> >To: 'MyFaces Development'
>> >Subject: Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release
>> >
>> >Never mind. I see that you committed to the shared trunk.  I merged it
>> >up to the branch for you.
>> >
>> >Sean
>> >
>> >On 6/7/06, Sean Schofield <sean.schofield@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Right but it will be recompiled into tomahawk via maven.  You checked
>> >> it into the shared branch right?
>> >>
>> >> Sean
>> >>
>> >> On 6/6/06, Dennis Byrne <dennis@dbyrne.net> wrote:
>> >> > The logging stuff actually was in shared though.
>> >> >
>> >> > Dennis Byrne
>> >> >
>> >> > >-----Original Message-----
>> >> > >From: Sean Schofield [mailto:sean.schofield@gmail.com]
>> >> > >Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2006 11:02 PM
>> >> > >To: 'MyFaces Development'
>> >> > >Subject: Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release
>> >> > >
>> >> > >OK so you will check your fix into the trunk then?  The current
1.1.3
>> >> > >snapshot isn't technically the release candidate because of the
>> >> > >logging changes that Dennis made.  I'll put together the official
>> >> > >release candidate tomorrow (Wednesday.)
>> >> > >
>> >> > >Sean
>> >> > >
>> >> > >On 6/6/06, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
>> >> > >> I figured out that treeTable's links aren't working, when
using RI
>> >> > >> But to me no showstopper.
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> So let's use 1.1.3-Snapshot as a RC
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> -Matthias
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> On 6/5/06, Dennis Byrne <dennis@dbyrne.net> wrote:
>> >> > >> > The logging was actually in shared BTW.
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> > Dennis Byrne
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> > >-----Original Message-----
>> >> > >> > >From: Sean Schofield [mailto:sean.schofield@gmail.com]
>> >> > >> > >Sent: Monday, June 5, 2006 11:18 PM
>> >> > >> > >To: 'MyFaces Development'
>> >> > >> > >Subject: Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release
>> >> > >> > >
>> >> > >> > >OK so once Dennis adds his logging stuff I will start
the release.
>> >> > >> > >Thanks for the help.  You are a MyFaces animal these
days.  Glad to
>> >> > >> > >have you back on full time!
>> >> > >> > >
>> >> > >> > >Sean
>> >> > >> > >
>> >> > >> > >On 6/5/06, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org>
wrote:
>> >> > >> > >> Sean-
>> >> > >> > >>
>> >> > >> > >> TOMAHAWK-458 works now for me...
>> >> > >> > >> I can't reproduce. May be I did something wrong
during my last testing.
>> >> > >> > >> For tomahawk 1.1.2 release I also tested against
RI and the scroller worked
>> >> > >> > >> there for me.
>> >> > >> > >>
>> >> > >> > >> I go ahead and close this issue.
>> >> > >> > >>
>> >> > >> > >> -Matthias
>> >> > >> > >>
>> >> > >> > >> On 6/5/06, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org>
wrote:
>> >> > >> > >> > Yes, Ill give it a try this evening (PST).
>> >> > >> > >> >
>> >> > >> > >> > -Matthias
>> >> > >> > >> >
>> >> > >> > >> > On 6/5/06, Sean Schofield <sean.schofield@gmail.com>
wrote:
>> >> > >> > >> > > Can we look at TOMAHAWK-458 and close
the door on this release?
>> >> > >> > >> > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > Sean
>> >> > >> > >> > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > On 6/2/06, Sean Schofield <sean.schofield@gmail.com>
wrote:
>> >> > >> > >> > > > I verified that two of the issues
are also present in the 1.1.2
>> >> > >> > >> > > > release so I don't consider these
showstoppers.  Anyone disagree?
>> >> > >> > >> > > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > That leaves one last bug.  TOMAHAWK-458.
 Can folks take a quick look
>> >> > >> > >> > > > at this one.
>> >> > >> > >> > > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > Sean
>> >> > >> > >> > > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf
<matzew@apache.org> wrote:
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > Jira issue created.
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > Will give RI tomorrow /
friday a more detailed try!
>> >> > >> > >> > > > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > -Matthias
>> >> > >> > >> > > > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > On 5/31/06, Sean Schofield
<sean.schofield@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > Matthias,
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > Can you add a few JIRA
issues with fix version as 1.1.3-SNAPSHOT.
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > That will allow us
to keep track of the outstanding issues.
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > Sean
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > On 5/31/06, Matthias
Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > RI makes some
trouble with this build of Tomahawk.
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > -Some links are
not working (sortable table for instance)
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > -Some links I
must trigger twice to get a *result* (scrolling through a table)
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > -Some exceptions
on the jsf page (instead of rendered output)
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > -forceId,jsp makes
troubles
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > >   duplicated IDs
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > >     commandLink
id=button inside    form id=forceIdForm
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > >     commandButton
id=button   inside    form id=dataTable
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > >   both are forceId=true
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > for me it should
be fine, since their jsf client id is
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > a)forceIdForm:button
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > b)dataTable:button
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > but not all components
are making problems
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > -fileupload or
tree2 are working fine.
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > -Matthias
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > On 5/31/06, Matthias
Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > Just check
the updated brunch.
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > Now the *rc*
looks good to me!
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > Each sample
works w/ MyFaces as JSF runtime.
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > Will give
it a try w/ RI as JSF runtime
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > -Matthias
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > On 5/30/06,
Sean Schofield <sean.schofield@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > Patch
has been applied.  Can we do a little more basic testing on
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > this?
 I will try to finish up the release process and start a vote
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > thread
tomorrow.  We should have some basic testing first though in
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > order
that we not have any embarassing mistakes like the one Matthias
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > found.
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > Sean
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > On 5/30/06,
Catalin Kormos <catalean@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
Thanks, i'm glad to be here :)
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
Sure, i'll prepare a patch and send it to you, i don't have commit rights
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
yet.
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
Regards,
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
Catalin
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
Sean Schofield <sean.schofield@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
 Catalin,
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
Welcome to the team.
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
Your dummy form explanation is probably correct. Someone added a
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
bunch of tags to many of the examples but probably not all.
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
Can you add them to the tomahawk branch? If you can't commit yet just
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
send me the patch.
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
Regards,
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
Sean
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
On 5/30/06, Catalin Kormos wrote:
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> I tested also those pages with the latest from SVN, a first problem is
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
that
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> they are missing an enclosing . Maybe now this a problem, cause the
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> dummy form is no more added? not sure though.
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
>
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> Regards,
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> Catalin
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
>
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> Sean Schofield wrote: @Matthias: Thanks for
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> testing
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
>
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> @Everyone: Any ideas on these?
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
>
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> Sean
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
>
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> On 5/29/06, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > mvn install for tomahawk 1_1_3 worked for me.
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > Installed the simple example war.
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > Some "pages" causing trouble:
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > -sortTable.jsf (not working; click on a link has no efect)
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > -sortAutoTable.jsf (same)
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > -pagedSortTable.jsf (clicking on the scroller icons has no effect,
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > when you click first time.
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > summary: for navigation to next page (after page has rendered first
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > time) it needs two clicks. after that each click goes to the next
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > page, as expected)
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > same for upload example too
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > Tree2 is working fine
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > -Matthias
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > -Matthias
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > On 5/26/06, Sean Schofield wrote:
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > I made a tomahawk 1_1_3 branch but its not compiling at the moment.
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > The references to jsf api and impl are 1.1.3-SNAPSHOT since 1.1.3 is
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > not in ibiblio yet (we need to take care of that btw.) I will change
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > them before the official release. That shouldn't make a difference
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > though.
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > I'm going to be offline for the weekend. Can some people take a look
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > at this over the weekend and do some basic testing? Just do a mvn
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > install after checking out the branch (no RC yet.)
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > Sean
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > --
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > Matthias Wessendorf
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > Aechterhoek 18
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > 48282 Emsdetten
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
>
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
>
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
>
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> ---------------------------------
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> rates.
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
>
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
 ________________________________
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
Do you Yahoo!?
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
 Get on board. You're invited to try the new Yahoo! Mail Beta.
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > --
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > Matthias
Wessendorf
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > Aechterhoek
18
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > 48282 Emsdetten
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > --
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > Aechterhoek 18
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > 48282 Emsdetten
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > --
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > Aechterhoek 18
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > 48282 Emsdetten
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
>> >> > >> > >> > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
>> >> > >> > >> > > > >
>> >> > >> > >> > > >
>> >> > >> > >> > >
>> >> > >> > >> >
>> >> > >> > >> >
>> >> > >> > >> > --
>> >> > >> > >> > Matthias Wessendorf
>> >> > >> > >> > Aechterhoek 18
>> >> > >> > >> > 48282 Emsdetten
>> >> > >> > >> > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
>> >> > >> > >> > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
>> >> > >> > >> >
>> >> > >> > >>
>> >> > >> > >>
>> >> > >> > >> --
>> >> > >> > >> Matthias Wessendorf
>> >> > >> > >> Aechterhoek 18
>> >> > >> > >> 48282 Emsdetten
>> >> > >> > >> blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
>> >> > >> > >> mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
>> >> > >> > >>
>> >> > >> > >
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> --
>> >> > >> Matthias Wessendorf
>> >> > >> Aechterhoek 18
>> >> > >> 48282 Emsdetten
>> >> > >> blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
>> >> > >> mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>



Mime
View raw message