myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Matthias Wessendorf" <mat...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [JSF 1.2] question
Date Wed, 07 Jun 2006 05:47:39 GMT
> tracking system), but there hasn't been a formal roadmap for JSF.next

so is JSF.next the project name for it?

> that happens, it would be very much appropriate that Apache have a
> representative on the EG, and it would seem to make the most sense that this
> rep be someone from the MyFaces community.

Manfred is already there. I think Martin is interested too.

-Matthias

> In the interim before the formal announcement, talk to Ed Burns and Roger
> Kitain, who were the co-spec leads for 1.2 (and AFAIK that's not changing
> for future versions, but I'm not as intimately connected with the specs
> world in my Creator architect role -- instead, I'm a customer :-) about the
> kinds of areas you would like to see a 2.0 spec cover.
>
> > -Matthias
>
>
> Craig
>
> > [1]
> https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=176
> >
> > On 6/6/06, Craig McClanahan < craigmcc@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 6/6/06, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > CONVERTER_ID =  "javax.faces.DoubleTime "
> > >
> > >
> > > Looks like a spec bug due to a cut-n-paste error in the RI's API
> classes.
> > > If so, the correct thing to do would be to report feedback via the
> website
> > > on the spec cover (
> > > https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net) so
> that
> > > it can get addressed as an errata, or included in a maintenance version
> of
> > > the 1.2 spec.
> > >
> > > Until then, though, I'd recommend you keep it ... this is the kind of
> > > mechanical detail that the API signature tests in the TCK will likely
> flag
> > > if it's missing.
> > >
> > > Craig
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > On 6/6/06, Matthias Wessendorf < matzew@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > Any reason for keeping [1] ?
> > > > >
> > > > > -Matthias
> > > > >
> > > > > [1] http://tinyurl.com/gjdxe
> > > > >
> > > > > On 6/5/06, Matthias Wessendorf < matzew@apache.org > wrote:
> > > > > > Ah,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > thanks. Some are some issues also the reasons, why UIComponent
is
> not
> > > > > > an interface?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 6/5/06, Adam Winer <awiner@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > Backwards compatibility - at least of a sort;  you won't
get
> > > > > > > AbstractMethodErrors when using 1.1-compiled subclasses.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -- Adam
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 6/5/06, Matthias Wessendorf < matzew@apache.org>
wrote:
> > > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > does anybody know why the methods added to ViewHandler
or
> > > > > > > > ExternalContext in 1.2 are not abstract, like their
*old* JSF
> 1.1
> > > > > > > > counterparts ?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > > > Aechterhoek 18
> > > > > > > > 48282 Emsdetten
> > > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > Aechterhoek 18
> > > > > > 48282 Emsdetten
> > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > Aechterhoek 18
> > > > > 48282 Emsdetten
> > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > Aechterhoek 18
> > > > 48282 Emsdetten
> > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> > Aechterhoek 18
> > 48282 Emsdetten
> > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> >
>
>


-- 
Matthias Wessendorf
Aechterhoek 18
48282 Emsdetten
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com

Mime
View raw message