Mailing-List: contact dev-help@myfaces.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "MyFaces Development" <dev@myfaces.apache.org>
Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: 207.113.241.148 is neither permitted
 nor denied by domain of stan.silvert@jboss.com)
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: Version of Servlet Container - Facelets
Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 13:23:18 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <C2CDEFBECFC9A14892BCCFB4C95F486806F43FC8@EX-201.mail.navisite.com>
Thread-Topic: Version of Servlet Container - Facelets
Thread-Index: AcaCDJiXWnq7DFz7QSSgpG65ob6CLgAdtQmg
From: "Stan Silvert" <stan.silvert@jboss.com>
To: "MyFaces Development" <dev@myfaces.apache.org>, <mmarinschek@apache.org>,
   "MyFaces Discussion" <users@myfaces.apache.org>

That's easy.

It will be JBoss 5.0 containing JSF 1.2, Tomcat 6, EJB 3, and Seam.
Probably Facelets too.

:-)

Stan Silvert
JBoss, Inc.
ssilvert@jboss.com
callto://stansilvert

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Marinschek [mailto:martin.marinschek@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 12:10 AM
> To: MyFaces Discussion; MyFaces Development
> Subject: Version of Servlet Container - Facelets
>=20
> May I ask a question out loud?
>=20
> In discussing implementing 1.2, the question has arisen what kind of
> servlet containers most users have in use currently respectively plan
> to use in the next half year.
>=20
> Can you answer with the corresponding number to help us figure out an
> optimal way of going on with the 1.2 implementation?
>=20
> (for me personally it's 1 - I can't change over my current project to
> facelets this easily, and this is why I'm stuck with number 1)
>=20
> regards,
>=20
> Martin
>=20
> 1) TC 5.x (or other not JSP 2.1 compliant)
> 2) TC 5.x (or other not JSP 2.1 compliant) with facelets (or willing
> to change their current projects to facelets, if necessary)
> 3) TC 6 or Glassfish (or other JSP 2.1 compliant)