Mailing-List: contact dev-help@myfaces.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "MyFaces Development" <dev@myfaces.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of thomas.spiegl@gmail.com
 designates 64.233.166.181 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=G448gHjKkGlHyn5XE3m6NLO/hWuPKd1zrPczZDvPX1xy/0eG6NNdZvv6hcJOy0IQWgYB+hOctOMyLwtJZKFLbvyMr3mgJrE2PwSVsgL9JTDXkDW8sLaXgeiswi4VxeOi5tM+oaGfBTozYLLch7trCyyP/EhZ/JznkhnlZsmxzM4=
Message-ID: <18ff88f90605171357g748d3c7dv28ee33baae4de21e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 22:57:56 +0200
From: "Thomas Spiegl" <thomas.spiegl@gmail.com>
To: "MyFaces Development" <dev@myfaces.apache.org>, werpu@gmx.at
Subject: Re: JSF 1.2 [was: Cancelled: JavaOne MyFaces Committers/Contributors
 meeting]
In-Reply-To: <e4fe2p$ttq$2@sea.gmane.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <564d4f680605120204m287564abpd955332f06e8214f@mail.gmail.com>
	 <44645872.7040209@ops.co.at>
	 <2387fbc50605161434t7b2ef736q1057a6091b230de4@mail.gmail.com>
	 <e4fe2p$ttq$2@sea.gmane.org>

+1 for solving tomahawk 416, being incompatible to RI is a serious issue

Stan which 1.2 issues did you fix. Did you change any link renderers?
If not, i am
+1 for open a 1.2 branch

On 5/17/06, Werner Punz <werpu@gmx.at> wrote:
> Sean Schofield schrieb:
> > I'm -1 on the 1.2 branch.  There are major issues to be fixed in the
> > core right now.  (See TOMAHAWK-416 and related dev discussions.)  I
> > know that Stan is anxious but given the lack of interest in the core
> > trunk, its hard to imagine we have enough support to sustain this
> > branch.  Do we have firm committments from anyone else besides Stan?
> >
> +1 for a fork... the reason we need to get going asap and a fork helps.
> If we wait for another bunch of issues to be fixed, this will never end.
> Sorry to say that so harsh, but the time on 1.2 is really pressing,
> given that there wont be an option in jee to override the default JSF
> implementation via other libs in WEB-INF/lib like it was possible in JEE4
>
>


--=20
http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces