myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Martin Marinschek" <martin.marinsc...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: JSF 1.2 [was: Cancelled: JavaOne MyFaces Committers/Contributors meeting]
Date Thu, 18 May 2006 17:32:21 GMT
Manfred, can you go ahead with that 1.2 branch?

regards,

Martin

On 5/18/06, Thomas Spiegl <thomas.spiegl@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm having a look at tomahawk 416
>
> +1 for creating a 1.2 branch
>
> On 5/18/06, Stan Silvert <stan.silvert@jboss.com> wrote:
> > I have implemented most of the new core API's and fixed most of the
> > deprecated ones to be backwards compatible with 1.1 (if you look at the
> > 1.2 javadocs you'll see what I mean).  If you look at the section in the
> > spec preface entitled "What's Changed Since the Last Release" you can
> > get a feel for what I did.  I've pretty much done everything in that
> > list.
> >
> > Most of it is covered under this issue, which just says to implement
> > several sections of the spec:
> > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1274
> >
> > I believe all of 1274 is complete except
> > ApplicationImpl.getResourceBundle().  I needed code that reads the new
> > faces-context.xml for that one.  However, all the ELResolver stuff is
> > done including the ResourceBundleELResolver.
> >
> > I've also done some of the issues listed under General Changes.  For
> > each item in that list, I created a Jira task.  You can look at Jira and
> > see which ones I did.
> >
> > I was just getting started on the javax.faces.webapp package when I was
> > taken off of the project.  I probably won't commit any changes from
> > that.  I didn't touch the components or renderer at all.  With all the
> > backward-compatible code I wrote, it appears that all the components
> > still work even though they are written the "1.1 way".
> >
> > So, hopefully, what you guys will have to start with is a JSF 1.2 impl
> > that is about half-way done and still works.
> >
> > Stan Silvert
> > JBoss, Inc.
> > ssilvert@jboss.com
> > callto://stansilvert
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Thomas Spiegl [mailto:thomas.spiegl@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 4:58 PM
> > > To: MyFaces Development; werpu@gmx.at
> > > Subject: Re: JSF 1.2 [was: Cancelled: JavaOne MyFaces
> > > Committers/Contributors meeting]
> > >
> > > +1 for solving tomahawk 416, being incompatible to RI is a serious
> > issue
> > >
> > > Stan which 1.2 issues did you fix. Did you change any link renderers?
> > > If not, i am
> > > +1 for open a 1.2 branch
> > >
> > > On 5/17/06, Werner Punz <werpu@gmx.at> wrote:
> > > > Sean Schofield schrieb:
> > > > > I'm -1 on the 1.2 branch.  There are major issues to be fixed in
> > the
> > > > > core right now.  (See TOMAHAWK-416 and related dev discussions.)
> > I
> > > > > know that Stan is anxious but given the lack of interest in the
> > core
> > > > > trunk, its hard to imagine we have enough support to sustain this
> > > > > branch.  Do we have firm committments from anyone else besides
> > Stan?
> > > > >
> > > > +1 for a fork... the reason we need to get going asap and a fork
> > helps.
> > > > If we wait for another bunch of issues to be fixed, this will never
> > end.
> > > > Sorry to say that so harsh, but the time on 1.2 is really pressing,
> > > > given that there wont be an option in jee to override the default
> > JSF
> > > > implementation via other libs in WEB-INF/lib like it was possible in
> > > JEE4
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > http://www.irian.at
> > >
> > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > Courses in English and German
> > >
> > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> >
>
>
> --
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>


-- 

http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces

Mime
View raw message