myfaces-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jacob Hookom <ja...@hookom.net>
Subject Re: Cancelled: JavaOne MyFaces Committers/Contributors meeting
Date Thu, 11 May 2006 14:16:25 GMT
I think it depends on the classloader... I wonder if the fact that you 
can specify an alternate Lifecycle on the FacesServlet mapping would 
allow you to hijack the implementation on a per webapp basis with JSF 1.2.



Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> that's my understanding as well.
>
> the only "problem" in my POV is that people might be wondering why the
> Myfaces-jars inside their WEB-INF/lib might be ignored (JavaEE 5).
>
> Will there be a logger-warning message ?
>
> -Matthias
>
> On 5/11/06, Stan Silvert <stan.silvert@jboss.com> wrote:
>> I don't see any reason why you couldn't do that.  We have people today
>> who remove MyFaces so they can use the RI.
>>
>> Stan Silvert
>> JBoss, Inc.
>> ssilvert@jboss.com
>> callto://stansilvert
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Martin Marinschek [mailto:martin.marinschek@gmail.com]
>> > Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 4:16 AM
>> > To: MyFaces Development
>> > Subject: Re: Cancelled: JavaOne MyFaces Committers/Contributors
>> meeting
>> >
>> > Stan,
>> >
>> > will it be possible to configure another JSF 1.2 implementation in
>> > JBoss, when the release is out? Meaning - will it be possible to put
>> > the RI out and MyFaces (in a 1.2 compatible version) in, if that is
>> > desired by the user?
>> >
>> > regards,
>> >
>> > Martin
>> >
>> > On 5/10/06, Werner Punz <werpu@gmx.at> wrote:
>> > > Dennis Byrne schrieb:
>> > > >> Also, JBoss has decided to use the RI instead of MyFaces for
>> JBoss 5.
>> > > >> The decision was purely one of time and resources.  By shipping
>> the
>> > RI
>> > > >> we will be able to pass the JEE 5 TCK sooner.
>> > > >
>> > > > We need to branch for 1.2 and get moving.
>> > > >
>> > > Btw. if anyone has not noticed yet, Craig pointed out at JAX a huge
>> > > "political" issue with JSF 1.2
>> > >
>> > > As of JEE 5 the webcontainers are not allowed in their classloader
>> > > hierarchy to make the jsf implementation overridable via a
>> WEB-INF/lib
>> > > jsf (as far as I understood, Craig correct me there if I am wrong).
>> > >
>> > > So it will become way harder to push a new jsf implementation into a
>> > > webapp as soon as an application moves from a plain servlet runner
>> > > towards Tomcat.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Werner
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > http://www.irian.at
>> >
>> > Your JSF powerhouse -
>> > JSF Consulting, Development and
>> > Courses in English and German
>> >
>> > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>>
>
>


-- 
--------------------------
Sent from my FrankenBerry Wireless Handheld


Mime
View raw message